Anyone else watched Dragonball Z Abridged? I feel quite like Frieza dealing with a verbally challenged Goku...

(January 6, 2014 at 2:51 am)Esquilax Wrote:

(January 6, 2014 at 2:43 am)Aral Gamelon Wrote: At the risk of being subjected to mind numbing, head spinning bullshit...

The fuck is "intuitional science"? I really don't want to read through enfreako's bullshit throughout the thread...

Funnily enough I'm already of the opinion it's not science.

Given that enrico is remarkably coy on defining the term, nor even mentioning a single scientific breakthrough that it has produced, it's pretty clear that it's just a term he made up in an attempt to ennoble the idea that believing whatever you want because it feels good to you is somehow justifiable.

You see, you are still stuck in the corral of dogma.
You say............nor even mentioning a single scientific breakthrough that it has produced............
In other words you say that if intuitional science is not understood by science then is nothing.
Again you can not bring any evidence that physical science is able to understand what is outside physicality.
The day you will be able to do this then you will be entitle to make judgments.

Ok. So science is a method. A method for finding stuff out by generating a falsifiable hypothesis and testing it.

What is the method intuitional science uses to find stuff out?

(January 6, 2014 at 8:41 am)Esquilax Wrote: It's right there, genius. In the brain. We've been able to see it light up with the effects of our consciousness for years.

Also the part of the iceberg under the water is there, we all know this.
The problem is to manage to bring it to the surface so it become part and parcel of us.

Quote:Nailed it: he decides what he wants to believe, and then compounds that dishonesty by calling that science.

I already explained that science is the effort to discover something new and that is not restricted by the term PHYSICAL SCIENCE.
If you can describe the correct meaning of the term science then please let me know.

(January 6, 2014 at 8:56 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: What is the method intuitional science uses to find stuff out?

Making shit up.

(January 6, 2014 at 8:56 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: Ok. So science is a method. A method for finding stuff out by generating a falsifiable hypothesis and testing it. What is the method intuitional science uses to find stuff out?

According to yoga at the bottom of the spinal cord there is the vital force called kundalini.
The method consist in bringing this vital force up to the top of the spinal cord in the pineal gland.
By cleaning this sort of pipe (spinal cord) then the vital force will be able to reach the top.
How it get cleaned?
By practicing yoga (tantric meditation, exercises, veg. diet, regular fasting, and other things).

(January 6, 2014 at 8:50 am)enrico Wrote: You see, you are still stuck in the corral of dogma.

Hoo boy, here we go again. For a guy who shat on others a few pages ago for repeating themselves, you sure do it a lot.

Quote:In other words you say that if intuitional science is not understood by science then is nothing.

No, I'm saying that if "intuitional science" is a science then it produces hypotheses and testable predictions that lead to applications in the real world, which is something I'd imagine you'd be all to happy to explain to us, if there actually were any.

But this is like the fourth time I've asked you this question, and it's the fourth time you've dodged it rather than providing an answer: at what point do we determine that your remarkable evasiveness is just down to the fact that you're simply making stuff up to legitimize the irrational prism through which you interpret the world, as though simply drawing the word science on your bullshit with crayon makes it reputable.

Now, can you produce any real results that intuitional science has produced, or not?

Quote:Again you can not bring any evidence that physical science is able to understand what is outside physicality.

You would first need to establish that there is something outside of physicality that science is failing to detect, which is another thing you've been asked multiple times, and another question you've dodged without providing anything.

You understand that you look like a conman or a fool, right?

Quote:The problem is to manage to bring it to the surface so it become part and parcel of us.

Have you established that consciousness is anything more than the emergent property of the brain that the current evidence shows it to be? No? Then stop putting the cart before the horse, moron.

Aral Gamelon Wrote:Anyone else watched Dragonball Z Abridged? I feel quite like Frieza dealing with a verbally challenged Goku...

And with nary a muffin button in sight.

(January 6, 2014 at 9:06 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:

(January 6, 2014 at 8:56 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: What is the method intuitional science uses to find stuff out?

Making shit up.

Oh, i was just thinking about you.
Did your translator got better so you could answer those question?
Do you think you can answer before the next Christmas?

(January 6, 2014 at 9:08 am)enrico Wrote:

(January 6, 2014 at 8:56 am)Jacob(smooth) Wrote: Ok. So science is a method. A method for finding stuff out by generating a falsifiable hypothesis and testing it. What is the method intuitional science uses to find stuff out?

According to yoga at the bottom of the spinal cord there is the vital force called kundalini.
The method consist in bringing this vital force up to the top of the spinal cord in the pineal gland.
By cleaning this sort of pipe (spinal cord) then the vital force will be able to reach the top.
How it get cleaned?
By practicing yoga (tantric meditation, exercises, veg. diet, regular fasting, and other things).

Ok, what does this have to do with intuitional science? Is it something discovered BY intuitional science? If so, how. What's the intuitional scientific method?

(January 6, 2014 at 9:12 am)enrico Wrote:

(January 6, 2014 at 9:06 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Making shit up.

Oh, i was just thinking about you.

Nothing dirty I hope. I don't generally swing both ways.