(April 1, 2014 at 11:34 am)Tonus Wrote:

(April 1, 2014 at 8:53 am)enrico Wrote: So, what is the inner meaning of philosophy?

So, what is the definition of a non-sequitor?

You are lucky you are not a student anymore (have you ever been one?)
If your teacher ask you a question and you reply to him by asking another question then you may have been kicked out the classroom.
So let me summarise.
1) You haven't got a clue about philosophy so what are you doing in a philosophy forum God only knows.
2) Sequitor from Latin = follow
In Italian follow = seguire.
So non-sequitor may apply to this thread that does not follow the original
topic.
3) It is not my fault if some people keep on vandalize my thread and the topic get lost (non-sequitor).
4) I would like the topic to stay but sometime there is the need also for me to stop it and ask some people what they are in the thread for.

---

(April 1, 2014 at 1:33 pm)Jacob(smooth) Wrote:

(April 1, 2014 at 11:34 am)Tonus Wrote: So, what is the definition of a non-sequitor?

Ah, problematic comparison. Non sequitur has a pretty much universally agreed definition which is available in the dictionary (and which as you observe, applies to Ricos question). Whereas there is no consensus on what an "inner meaning" of anything actually is. It's a meaningless question, Like what's the meaning of life the universe and everything (42). However I'm sure Ricos inner Intuitional whatever is about to shat out his view on this and I for one can't wait to here the bizarre answer to his irrational question.

You see Jako within this FINITE universe everything is really meaningless.
It is all about survive and stay afloat.
There is no real progress so i agree that within this universe any inner meaning is meaningless.
That however does not apply to an INFINITE situation.
Philosophy lead to INFINITE as love for wisdom can not be FINITE.
I could continue but i don't think that at this stage of your development
you would understand much.

(April 1, 2014 at 1:54 pm)whateverist Wrote:

(April 1, 2014 at 8:53 am)enrico Wrote: So, what is the inner meaning of philosophy?

Oh, go ahead and tell us. You know you want to. What have you decided is the innermost, super-duper, eternal, most high meaning of philosophy?

(It's okay, my doctor says i am healthy enough for deep belly laughs.)

Your doctor is misleading you.
Years ago i saw a girl that had her jaw stuck.
She could not close her mouth again.
That was caused by laughing open mouth.
Only after a painful hospital adjustment she could close her mouth again.
Don't try mister.
Worse of all is getting your jaw stuck for something that you thought
was funny and then turn to be the opposite of what you thought.
The old saying........LAUGHS BEST WHO LAUGHS LAST.

I NEED YOUR HELP
HELP PLEASE.

I have been looking at a study in which it is said that omnivores digestive system is very similar to carnivores.
Now i try to understand what this means.
If you guys say that man is omnivore then we are very similar to lions
and tigers, right?
I know that you guys are all very intelligent so you can help me to understand this difficult issue.


Omnivores
Omnivores consume both meat and plant matter; they have a digestive system very similar to carnivores but also have a working caecum (not as well adapted as in herbivores). Due to this flexibility they are able to consume a wide diet, which has also prevented them losing the ability to synthesise certain products in the body (as in carnivores).
The process of digestion is extremely similar to carnivores, except a few minor adaptations which allow them to digested plant matter – although not as efficiently as herbivores.


http://vetsci.co.uk/2010/05/14/comparative-digestion/

(April 2, 2014 at 7:30 am)enrico Wrote: 1) You haven't got a clue about philosophy so what are you doing in a philosophy forum God only knows.

"Are humans omnivores" is not a philosophical topic, which makes your comment deliciously ironic. As opposed to ridiculously insane, like most of your other comments.

(April 2, 2014 at 8:32 am)enrico Wrote: I NEED YOUR HELP
HELP PLEASE.

I have been looking at a study in which it is said that omnivores digestive system is very similar to carnivores.
Now i try to understand what this means.
If you guys say that man is omnivore then we are very similar to lions
and tigers, right?
I know that you guys are all very intelligent so you can help me to understand this difficult issue.


Omnivores
Omnivores consume both meat and plant matter; they have a digestive system very similar to carnivores but also have a working caecum (not as well adapted as in herbivores). Due to this flexibility they are able to consume a wide diet, which has also prevented them losing the ability to synthesise certain products in the body (as in carnivores).
The process of digestion is extremely similar to carnivores, except a few minor adaptations which allow them to digested plant matter – although not as efficiently as herbivores.


http://vetsci.co.uk/2010/05/14/comparative-digestion/

(April 2, 2014 at 8:32 am)enrico Wrote: If you guys say that man is omnivore then we are very similar to lions
and tigers, right?

So are you saying that man is very similar to giraffes and koala bears?

(April 2, 2014 at 8:32 am)enrico Wrote: I NEED YOUR HELP
HELP PLEASE.

I really wish there was more we could do but you must first want to be helped. It has to start with you admitting you don't already have all the answers.

(April 2, 2014 at 8:32 am)enrico Wrote: I NEED YOUR HELP
HELP PLEASE.

I have been looking at a study in which it is said that omnivores digestive system is very similar to carnivores.
Now i try to understand what this means.
If you guys say that man is omnivore then we are very similar to lions
and tigers, right?
I know that you guys are all very intelligent so you can help me to understand this difficult issue.

Our digestive system is very similar to a carnivores, as I said before our digestive is around 5 times our body length. Compare this with a dog, its digestive system is around 6 times its body length. For a Cat this is around 4 times. For a rabbit it is around 10 times.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10...160502/pdf

The difference between humans (and an omnivore more generally) versus a dog is we have a more developed caecum. But what is the function of the caecum? It's to break down vegetable matter. Yet in herbivores the caecum is so well developed that they can digest cellulose. We cannot. We therefore not herbivores.

(March 28, 2014 at 6:30 am)enrico Wrote: Over a dozen of you guys try to say that the man is omnivore.
Every single time i did knock down your assertions.

You know what's truly sad here is you actually believe this.

---

(March 28, 2014 at 6:44 am)enrico Wrote: I am sorry Stimbo.
It is me that got to apologize.
Just yesterday when i was walking around the shopping center
i saw a man dressed in black.
He was turned the other way so i could not see his face but
from behind he look exactly like you.
I just run a bit faster so i could come to you and say.....
.....hi Stimbo....how are you.....
Well, what a terrible surprize!
When i saw his face he look horrible like a monster.
He could not be you of course unless that was the real you.
Was it you?

And here you demonstrate you are as totally, utterly, inadequately inept at satire as you are with science. Or indeed anything else you've presented around here. At least you're consistent, even if it's the consistency of stool water.

---

(March 29, 2014 at 8:57 am)enrico Wrote: Sure it can happen.
It almost happen to me the other day.
I closed my eyes for a minute while lying down when
Scarlett Johansson appear in front of me and said......my dear come
with me.

AAAARRGGHHHHH!!! WHERE'S THAT GODDAMNED BRAIN-BLEACH WHEN YOU NEED IT?!?!?!