(April 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:

(April 30, 2014 at 4:35 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote: Ken's slave brought it up during the debate with bill, and it was brought up. Unfortunately his friend was lying.

If it isn't a guppy giving birth to a Great Dane it isn't macro evolution. Just ask old 777 if you think I'm wrong.

Ironically that would disprove evolution. Seems like a fallacy if you ask me.

(April 30, 2014 at 5:11 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:

(April 30, 2014 at 4:54 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: If it isn't a guppy giving birth to a Great Dane it isn't macro evolution. Just ask old 777 if you think I'm wrong.

Ironically that would disprove evolution. Seems like a fallacy if you ask me.

No, it would disprove evolution by natural selection of heritable characteristics. It wouldn't disprove evolution.

(April 30, 2014 at 5:14 pm)Chuck Wrote:

(April 30, 2014 at 5:11 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote: Ironically that would disprove evolution. Seems like a fallacy if you ask me.

No, it would disprove evolution by natural selection of heritable characteristics. It wouldn't disprove evolution.

Ya that is it. I don't want to know what kind of evolution that is.

(April 30, 2014 at 5:15 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:

(April 30, 2014 at 5:14 pm)Chuck Wrote: No, it would disprove evolution by natural selection of heritable characteristics. It wouldn't disprove evolution.

Ya that is it. I don't want to know what kind of evolution that is.

Hey, I wouldn't know what kind either, only it would still be enough to prove the christian concept of fixity of divinely created "kind" wrong

(April 30, 2014 at 5:18 pm)Chuck Wrote:

(April 30, 2014 at 5:15 pm)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote: Ya that is it. I don't want to know what kind of evolution that is.

Hey, I wouldn't know what kind either, only it would still be enough to prove the christian concept of fixity of divinely created "kind" wrong

That and everyone would except it. We would because will evidence shows thats how it happened, and creationist had there strawman come true.

Actually it is. Take artificial selection for an example.

(April 30, 2014 at 5:23 pm)No_God Wrote: Actually it is. Take artificial selection for an example.

Dogs.

Evolution did a superior job with wolves. Then man came along and we have fucking chihuahuas and German Shepherds who can't walk after they turn 3 and Great Danes who have hearts that give out by the time they are 8 and Irish Setters who are beautiful but neurotic and so on.

So much for "intelligent" design.

I chuckle knowing that evolution-deniers sustain themselves every single day by eating food which has noticeably evolved from its wild state.

(April 30, 2014 at 7:29 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: I chuckle knowing that evolution-deniers sustain themselves every single day by eating food which has noticeably evolved from its wild state.

They use that same kind bullshit. I already addressed that argument in another post.