Chili Wrote:I do not really understand but I see them swimming and must penetrate the ovum, or what we would call egg that comes from the womb of man as woman in which lovers are said to be soul-mates. In opposite to this a one nigh stand

Reproductive biology as poetry!


Are you sure you didn't mean, "a one neigh stand?"

No, no. Conception happens on the night stand next to the alarm clock. But only if the couple prays very hard.

(January 1, 2015 at 8:26 pm)JuliaL Wrote: Are you sure you didn't mean, "a one neigh stand?"

I'm going to assume that a "one nigh stand" is when he strips off his clothes, jumps into bed, realizes that he is alone... and then sees the open window.

(January 1, 2015 at 8:50 am)Rhythm Wrote: @abaris. Yup, had to.

@Benny. Not all "pressure" is interchangeable. I know people who are great under actual fire...but have crumbled "under fire" in civilian life, and vv.

Courage is a funny thing. Even the same guy, on a different day, can and will respond differently to the exact same input.

---

(January 1, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Chili Wrote:

(January 1, 2015 at 5:39 pm)abaris Wrote: Do you understand the difference between fertile sperm and live sperm as in being alive? If sperm were alive, what's the purpose of a woman in your mind? Just the oven to bake the bread?

No, I do not really understand but I see them swimming and must penetrate the ovum, or what we would call egg that comes from the womb of man as woman in which lovers are said to be soul-mates. In opposite to this a one nigh stand is possible that would yield a bastard child with little or less self direction later in life, much like a Starbuck slave maybe.

Could it be right to say that this is where nature-nurture first begins?

And how do you explain children arising from rape? And are you as loving and concerned about them?

(January 2, 2015 at 12:08 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:

(January 1, 2015 at 8:50 am)Rhythm Wrote: @abaris. Yup, had to.

@Benny. Not all "pressure" is interchangeable. I know people who are great under actual fire...but have crumbled "under fire" in civilian life, and vv.

Courage is a funny thing. Even the same guy, on a different day, can and will respond differently to the exact same input.

---

(January 1, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Chili Wrote: No, I do not really understand but I see them swimming and must penetrate the ovum, or what we would call egg that comes from the womb of man as woman in which lovers are said to be soul-mates. In opposite to this a one nigh stand is possible that would yield a bastard child with little or less self direction later in life, much like a Starbuck slave maybe.

Could it be right to say that this is where nature-nurture first begins?

And how do you explain children arising from rape? And are you as loving and concerned about them?

Sorry I am not loving or concerned here but if the word bastard has room to be it would be because the nurture is not able to compliment the nature in that same family environment. It has little to do with good or bad but more with destiny as a member of that family.

(January 2, 2015 at 1:12 am)Chili Wrote: Sorry I am not loving or concerned here but if the word bastard has room to be it would be because the nurture is not able to compliment the nature in that same family environment. It has little to do with good or bad but more with destiny as a member of that family.

So, I was asking about children arising from rape -- remember, you said that children come from soul-mates.

Would you answer my question, and do so in a coherent manner?

(January 2, 2015 at 1:59 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:

(January 2, 2015 at 1:12 am)Chili Wrote: Sorry I am not loving or concerned here but if the word bastard has room to be it would be because the nurture is not able to compliment the nature in that same family environment. It has little to do with good or bad but more with destiny as a member of that family.

So, I was asking about children arising from rape -- remember, you said that children come from soul-mates.

Would you answer my question, and do so in a coherent manner?

No I did not say that children come from soul mates, but what we know as 'free love' marriage was an institution of the eleventh century so that the possibility of souls-mates can be real, and this would be inside the church that they called Catholic.

Now if you think that the idea of soul mates cannot be true the word bastard no longer has reasonable grounds to be. That's all.

(January 2, 2015 at 2:41 am)Chili Wrote: No I did not say that children come from soul mates, but what we know as 'free love' marriage was an institution of the eleventh century so that the possibility of souls-mates can be real, and this would be inside the church that they called Catholic.

Sorry, you were saying?

(January 1, 2015 at 6:33 pm)Chili Wrote: [...] or what we would call egg that comes from the womb of man as woman in which lovers are said to be soul-mates.

***********************

(January 2, 2015 at 2:41 am)Chili Wrote: Now if you think that the idea of soul mates cannot be true the word bastard no longer has reasonable grounds to be. That's all.

My opinion about soul mates has no bearing on the meaning of the word bastard.

Sorry, I can add here that if the thousand year reign is already in our midst that would be true only if our heritage is very similar so that lovers can unite in this similarity, for which then religion it tradition based and not dependent on the number of bible passages we read. Then if you read that some of the ancients were close to 1000 years old, that would mean they could read their own soul nature back in history that far.

From this would follow that a bastard child in our recent history would be a dead-end right there, and this idea is presented in Luke someplace where Jesus rattled of his own lineage past all the ancients, past Adam and right back to God is first person in him.

I think this one has been hitting the communion wine a little too hard.