Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:35 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Won2blv Wrote: Do catholics say that priests hold the ultimate moral authority? The elders in my religion are just looked at as men that we can trust to guide us in a spiritually mature way but that it would almost be comical to expect perfection out of them
No one is expecting "perfection". Not f***ing kids is hardly much to ask.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Posts: 8217
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:35 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The irony of this is that you know this is true because everyone goes absolutely ballistic when a Catholic priest commits a sin. Why? Because it is understood even by atheists that Christians are supposed to live by a higher standard. When they fail to do so, the hypocrisy is seen by all.
Once again you misrepresent atheists. We do not go ballistic when a priest rapes a member of their flock because we think "Christians are supposed to live by a higher standard." We go ballistic when a priest rapes a member of their flock because the church claims that those same priests have some kind of moral authority.
Quit twisting words and positions to misrepresent others, Randy. Not only is it dishonest, it's repulsive as well.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 8217
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:37 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 5:11 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: (June 20, 2015 at 5:07 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Not from what Ive seen here on this very thread. 
When we were discussing the sex abuse scandal many pages back, numerous members of this forum specifically said that it's worse when priests do it because they are "supposed to be men of god."
This was addressed by multiple atheists in this site on this very thread.
Actually, no; what we've objected to is that priests themselves claim to have the ultimate moral authority. I would venture a guess that no atheists think that priests actually possess that.
May I please have permission to give about 5,000 kudos to this?!?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:40 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 5:37 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: (June 20, 2015 at 5:11 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Actually, no; what we've objected to is that priests themselves claim to have the ultimate moral authority. I would venture a guess that no atheists think that priests actually possess that.
May I please have permission to give about 5,000 kudos to this?!?
Only if I get 10% interest
Posts: 5706
Threads: 67
Joined: June 13, 2014
Reputation:
69
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 5:43 pm by Jenny A.)
(June 20, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: (June 20, 2015 at 12:41 pm)Jenny A Wrote: And, I'm not the least bothered by the man who does her in his head. What he does in the space of his own mind is fine by me. Seriously. In the case of imagining sex I'm really, really not bothered. In the case of imaging murder, I'm only bothered if he's working himself up to the actual crime by thinking it out rather than just fantasizing. It's acts in the real world that concern me.
Now, there are circumstances in which if someone obsesses about sex with a woman he can't have, or murder that he might hurt himself mentally. That is a good reason for not obsessing, but the victim would be himself not others.
That's fine, Jenny, but this is just your personal opinion. God has called us to a higher standard.
The irony of this is that you know this is true because everyone goes absolutely ballistic when a Catholic priest commits a sin. Why? Because it is understood even by atheists that Christians are supposed to live by a higher standard. When they fail to do so, the hypocrisy is seen by all.
I doubt anyone would go ballistic outside of other priests to discover, say pornography in a priest's possession or that they masturbate (and I'm pretty sure they do). It's actual child molestation that's the problem. And the outrage is not about the priests so much as the church covering it up and setting them up to do it over and over in new communities.
(June 20, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: So, it's perfectly okay to be consumed by hatred as long as....what? I don't say or do anything to anyone else?
Morally? Yes. For your own health no. It would be a lousy way to live.
(June 20, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Jenny Wrote:And if such a god existed and he did know them, then I would appreciate very much if he didn't spy and left people's inner thoughts to themselves. You proposed standard is reminiscent of Orwell's 1984 and replacing Big Brother with god makes it no better.
![[Image: extra_happy.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=forums.catholic.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fani%2Fextra_happy.gif)
That is exactly the point I have made again and again concerning the "evidence" of God that you and others keep demanding.
If God were to intrude into our individual lives in visible ways, then you and others would resent Him.
So, sending people to hell isn't intruding? There aren't other kinds of evidence than mind reading or personal intrusion? Really? You've got to be kidding.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Posts: 67166
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:41 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 5:42 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
Quote:There are 114 pages lol. Yall are gonna have to either take my word, or assume I'm lying/delusional.
I've been obliging you on that count since page 1. I haven't even had to choose. I take you at your word -and- think that you're a delusional liar. 
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 5399
Threads: 256
Joined: December 1, 2013
Reputation:
60
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:43 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 5:35 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote: No one is expecting "perfection". Not f***ing kids is hardly much to ask. But clearly it is much for some people whose psychological propensities render children sexually attractive.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:43 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 5:47 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(June 20, 2015 at 5:29 pm)abaris Wrote: Also, there's one thing I really don't understand. You're constantly talking about the times being different when the bible has been written and we shouldn't apply our standards to the people of old. Yes, we can agree on that, but for me it follows that moral standards are relative, since, well, societies and times keep changing. But you argue, correct me if I'm wrong, that morals are somehow eternal. That really seems contradictory.
There are 2 things at play here:
1. Moral objectivity
2. Personal culpability
An act may be objectively immoral as the act in and of itself. But the person's culpability for commiting that act, is subjective.
For example, an insane person can go into psychotics and commit mass murder. Yes, the ACT they have committed is an objectively immoral act.
But considering the person's state of mind, their culpability is lessened. That person's culpability is less than that of a a person who committed the same act but did so fully conscientiously. The insane person is held at a lower standard and should thus receive less severe punishment, if any at all.
Does that make more sense?
Quote: (June 20, 2015 at 5:14 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: It was a little more than that with some people. I'm pretty sure "men of god" was used once or twice at least.
Probably because sarcasm isn't readable but only audible. "Men of god" meaning they're riding the high horse, trying to assume the moral authority and handing out marching orders on how to behave. If you're doing that kind of thing, you better have an impeccable record.
Could very possibly be.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 3541
Threads: 0
Joined: January 20, 2015
Reputation:
35
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:50 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 4:54 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: The irony of this is that you know this is true because everyone goes absolutely ballistic when a Catholic priest commits a sin.[...]
No, dumbass. We go ballistic when an organization, that advertises itself as an authority on morality, WILLFULLY COVERS UP the crimes of its members, in order to keep up appearances of moral superiority. What is so difficult to understand about this?
Oh, and BTW - "sin" is just a clever word that lets you put child rape in the same category as masturbation, or cursing. We don't give a f*** about "sin". It's crime and perversion of justice that p***es us off.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Posts: 13122
Threads: 130
Joined: October 18, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: What IS good, and how do we determine it?
June 20, 2015 at 5:51 pm
(June 20, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Does that make more sense?
No, not really. And I don't mean that in an offensive way. The old ones weren't insane or incapable of seeing what they were doing. They only had different standards to live by. That's why I always keep arguing that all the books of the bible are mirrors of their time and of the societies where they were compiled.
I don't judge these people for seeing the described things as good and just. I also don't judge people who still want to introduce an at least 2000 years old behavioral codex into their personal lives. What I have a real problem with, are those people, who want to do that for the whole of society.
|
![[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-d-3rfdI7nG0%2FTerwtFyFXoI%2FAAAAAAAACak%2F7kFSmHeVrng%2Fs320%2FBumper%2BSticker%2B-%2BAsheville%2B-%2BPraise%2BDog3.JPG)
