|
BEASTIALITY
|
 (September 3, 2015 at 3:25 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Interesting development in the law. Hey, ranching can be a, uh, lonely business. 
The only states on that list that surprise me are New Jersey and Ohio. The rest are typical.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane" - sarcasm_only
"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable." - Maryam Namazie  
Lemonvariable72
Copenhagen School  Religious Views: Its all bullshit to keep you handing money to the usher. (September 3, 2015 at 8:45 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Apparently it really is a thing. I'll just drop this here. That's why aliens won't talk to us.
To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day, To the last syllable of recorded time; And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player, That struts and frets his hour upon the stage, And then is heard no more. It is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing. 
That cat is not giving me oral. That's for sure.
 (September 3, 2015 at 8:45 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote: Apparently it really is a thing. I'll just drop this here. W'ister, I can never undo what I just saw, can I? I'm convinced I've been living a sheltered life. Out of curiosity, were those donkey humpers religious? I bet they were.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.  RE: BEASTIALITY
September 4, 2015 at 4:32 am
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2015 at 4:35 am by robvalue.)
The consent argument is totally valid, it's just inconsistent with all the other ways in which it is socially acceptable to violate an animal's consent, and not for their benefit.
To me, the question of consent is, "Would this person/animal agree with what I am doing if they could understand the situation as well as I do?" This covers times when medical intervention is necessary and so on, and arguably euthanasia. Self-defence is obviously an exception too. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum 
Bestiality is ONLY justified in self-defence...
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![[Image: nice_things.jpg]](https://catmacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/nice_things.jpg)
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)
