Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 10, 2024, 5:30 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
God's economy
#11
RE: God's economy
Well it also says that if a person won't work then let him starve.

2 Thessalonians 3:10 (NKJV) = "For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat."
Reply
#12
RE: God's economy
God's economy:

keep borrowing and borrowing against the future. No crash is coming. Just keep believing. Ignore the mounting problems. Keep believing at all costs.
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
Reply
#13
RE: God's economy
God is as ignorant of economics as he is of science and morality.
Reply
#14
RE: God's economy
(February 21, 2016 at 5:48 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Well it also says that if a person won't work then let him starve.

2 Thessalonians 3:10 (NKJV) = "For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat."

What?! Conflicts in the Bible??

ROFLOL

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#15
RE: God's economy
(February 21, 2016 at 5:51 am)FebruaryOfReason Wrote: God's economy:

keep borrowing and borrowing against the future. No crash is coming. Just keep believing. Ignore the mounting problems. Keep believing at all costs.

My aunt and uncle do this, Joel Fucking Osteen has a lot to do with it.  Dodgy
[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Reply
#16
RE: God's economy
(February 19, 2016 at 7:30 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: God ordains communism.

Really.

Go read about Ananias and Sapphira.

They weren't good enough commies and God SLEW them for being slackers.


Pretty clear to me that Karl Marx lifted his whole scheme from the BIBLE.

BTW, the pilgrims (the 1620 Plymouth, Massachusetts pilgrims) tried BIBLE COMMUNISM, and threw in the towel on it after killing 2/3 of their flock.

The pilgrims problem was by and large they knew fuck all about farming.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
#17
RE: God's economy
(February 9, 2016 at 7:54 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Watching a movie set on an an American Indian reservation prompted a thought about the economy types represented within the bible. It is notable that the bible does not address the evil of "Taxation without representation" or the evils of theft by government. In several American Indian nations, there was little to no concept of personal ownership of land. Yet ownership of land by god's chosen tribes is a major theme that runs throughout the bible.

Why would a god promote individual and tribal possession over universal freedom if it were more than a goat herder's story?

Why do you think one is better than the other? Why wouldn't he? Is it evil to own land?
Reply
#18
RE: God's economy
(February 9, 2016 at 7:54 pm)Brakeman Wrote: Watching a movie set on an an American Indian reservation prompted a thought about the economy types represented within the bible. It is notable that the bible does not address the evil of "Taxation without representation" or the evils of theft by government. In several American Indian nations, there was little to no concept of personal ownership of land. Yet ownership of land by god's chosen tribes is a major theme that runs throughout the bible.

Why would a god promote individual and tribal possession over universal freedom if it were more than a goat herder's story?

That's a BS compareason.

The Indians highly valued tribal lands just like the Jews did.

Land meant clean water, food, and the supplies needed to survive both in the Americas as well as the Middle east.

Why do you think their was so much infighting among the different tribes if their wasn't any value placed on land ownership?

How was this tribal conflict any different than the Tribe of Israel fighting the moabites or the Canaanites in your opinion? Or did you do no research before you came to your conclusion?

If you didn't do any research this would explain alot in the way you phrased your questions. No research means you assume that the Indians as a race of people never fought over personal ownership of land. Meaning people Generally did not fight over parcels. However that does not mean they did not fight argue and die over land between tribes. Matter of fact why do you think their were few disputes over personal ownership? Because unlike your understanding of society, individuality was crushed in their soceity. People were not allowed to see them selves as individuals, but as a small part of a larger tribe. It again was the tribe who own lands, it was one's task to defend his land when challenged, individuals could not do this alone, but tribes could send dozens if not hundreds of warriors to defend and Conquer land.. JUST LIKE THE JEWS DID! Dodgy
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  God is god, and we are not god StoryBook 43 13815 January 6, 2014 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: StoryBook
  God get's angry, Moses changes God's plans of wrath, God regrets "evil" he planned Mystic 9 7177 February 16, 2012 at 8:17 am
Last Post: Strongbad



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)