Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 5:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thomas Jefferson
#11
Thomas Jefferson
I can't wait.
[Image: bb478cdc77aeeb401ed7c864b1ec2dd2.jpg]
Reply
#12
RE: Thomas Jefferson
Will he be bedding foreign heads of state's spouses in the Lincoln Bedroom ?

Could be entertaining . . .
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
#13
RE: Thomas Jefferson
I'm legitimately afraid of Trump being President. Foreign leaders have already gone on record saying they don't respect him; the only one who does like him is Putin (does that not set off any red flags?) Not to mention the whole rounding up minorities bit, the whole enacting religious tests at the border bit, and, oh, just a few days ago he said he'd want to change libel laws to limit the free speech of the press. Has America really degraded enough to elect the closest thing we've seen to a fascist candidate? The thought terrifies me.
[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]
Reply
#14
RE: Thomas Jefferson
Quote:Has America really degraded enough to elect the closest thing we've seen to a fascist candidate?

Is that a trick question?
Reply
#15
RE: Thomas Jefferson
(February 28, 2016 at 3:48 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Will he be bedding foreign heads of state's spouses in the Lincoln Bedroom ?

Could be entertaining . . .

I think Kennedy and Clinton have already been there. Big deal. Anybody who begrudges that to the leader of the free world is a fool. I'm more concerned about them doing things like lieing about intelligence reports as a justification for going to war and pretending that global warming doesn't exist - thus endangering the future of humanity.

I know you're being fececious, Vorlon, I just want to make it clear: Not all "sins" are equal. I'll take Democratic "sins" over Republican "sins" anyday.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
Reply
#16
RE: Thomas Jefferson
Donald Trump would set this country back even further. He'd re-ban gay marriage, his tax plan would only benefit the extremely rich (and put our country further into debt).

I'm surprised the Republicans waited so long to attack him on Trump university, but I guess they were afraid they'd appear pro-public education if they did that.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply
#17
RE: Thomas Jefferson
(February 28, 2016 at 3:16 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: GWB managed to win this way but only barely and against two uncharasmatic Democratic candidates.

The first election he didn't win at all. Only because Gore stepped down from making further complaints and only because a court stopped the vote counting, did Shrub manage to park his ass in the Oval Office. It was only about 500 votes in Florida - where another Shrub ruled at the time.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#18
RE: Thomas Jefferson
(February 28, 2016 at 5:35 pm)abaris Wrote:
(February 28, 2016 at 3:16 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: GWB managed to win this way but only barely and against two uncharasmatic Democratic candidates.

The first election he didn't win at all. Only because Gore stepped down from making further complaints and only because a court stopped the vote counting, did Shrub manage to park his ass in the Oval Office. It was only about 500 votes in Florida - where another Shrub ruled at the time.

Yes, I'm well aware of this. I lived in the Florida Keys at the time.

Gore fucked up in that he pushed only for recounts in the counties he thought favored him. Had he insisted on ALL counties being recounted, he would have won.

The biggest issue was the damn butterfly ballots in Palm Beach county. A shitload of people who thought they were voting for Gore were actually marking their vote for Pat Buchanon.

The moral of this story is that every vote really does count. There were a shitload of people I know who lamented the fact that we could have swung the election if we had campaigned hard for Gore in the Florida Keys. But people never believe they could really make a difference in a nation of 300 million people. Any of us Floridians could have really made a difference if we had only known.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
Reply
#19
RE: Thomas Jefferson
(February 28, 2016 at 1:18 pm)Minimalist Wrote:
Quote:"The most effectual means of preventing [the perversion of power into tyranny are] to illuminate, as far as practicable, the minds of the people at large, and more especially to give them knowledge of those facts which history exhibits, that possessed thereby of the experience of other ages and countries, they may be enabled to know ambition under all its shapes, and prompt to exert their natural powers to defeat its purposes." --Thomas Jefferson 1779


[Image: stand_with_trump1.jpg]


Looks like we fucked that up, Tom.

Trump is certainly no Jefferson, who was a racist to the bone.  He and his buddy Washington fought a war to ensure slavery in America.  Jefferson was a great thinker, writer, and speaker.  Trump uses a 200 word vocabulary.  Trump is a racist but he has no plans to bring back slavery.  He might want to throw black people in prison but the Clintons did do that and if Hillary is elected that's what she will do again.
Reply
#20
RE: Thomas Jefferson
That might be a bit of a stretch, regarding Jefferson and Washington... given that they were wealthy (at least for part of their lives) plantation owners in Virginia, both of them held radical views for their time, despite also holding slaves. Washington wrote extensively on the problems, both personal and economic, of maintaining the slavery system; he simply didn't see a way they could compensate people who'd invested large amounts of capital in their chattel-workers, in such a way that they could free the slaves without crashing the economy. However, Washington also lamented that the system did not allow flexibility-- you could not move individual workers around (or sell them) without breaking up families, to the moral detriment of the owner as well as to the morale blow it dealt to the workers, meaning you could not switch to a new crop easily (say, following land exhaustion or blight) because your workers only knew how to grow the previous one, and you couldn't just hire new wage-workers who knew the task for which they were being hired.

Jefferson, according to monticello.org, was quite racist (he believed that racial separation was necessary and that peaceful coexistence was impossible, and referred to the African race as "children"), but he was also fiercely opposed to the practice of slavery:

Throughout his entire life, Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of slavery. Calling it a “moral depravity” and a “hideous blot,” he believed that slavery presented the greatest threat to the survival of the new American nation. Jefferson also thought that slavery was contrary to the laws of nature, which decreed that everyone had a right to personal liberty. [...]
At the time of the American Revolution, Jefferson was actively involved in legislation that he hoped would result in slavery’s abolition. In 1778, he drafted a Virginia law that prohibited the importation of enslaved Africans. In 1784, he proposed an ordinance that would ban slavery in the Northwest territories. But Jefferson always maintained that the decision to emancipate slaves would have to be part of a democratic process; abolition would be stymied until slaveowners consented to free their human property together in a large-scale act of emancipation. To Jefferson, it was anti-democratic and contrary to the principles of the American Revolution for the federal government to enact abolition or for only a few planters to free their slaves.

[Internal citations omitted.] Reference: https://www.monticello.org/site/plantati...nd-slavery

There is no possible way you can justify the statement, "They fought a war to ensure slavery in America."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  It Seems That Thomas Can't Handle Minimalist 6 1117 June 20, 2016 at 12:22 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Thomas Jefferson - A Great Man and Mind being Minimalist 4 1160 February 9, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  Thomas Sowell: Left vs Right goddamnit 0 2037 July 11, 2012 at 11:26 pm
Last Post: goddamnit



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)