RE: "Men's rights activists are pig misogynists,men don't have issues!"
April 24, 2016 at 11:59 pm
(This post was last modified: April 25, 2016 at 12:37 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(April 24, 2016 at 11:34 pm)Losty Wrote: (April 24, 2016 at 11:20 pm)pool the great Wrote: It's a good thing I can go back and quote what you said.
Nice try, 1 point for effort though
Still waiting for evidence that backs up your claim Losty.
Where is the quote when I said that biology had no bearing, jackass?
Let me explain,shameless harlot.
This was my post :
Quote:Okay, you could've just said you didn't know.
I'll explain, from old times itself, humans mated by using visual cues,ie, males with a good physique tend to give more healthier babies and such. This meant more chances of passing on genes.
These rules you say that are imposed are hard-coded biologically by nature,not by society.
This was my post on which I was arguing that the standards you mentioned were not imposed by society but by biology. Of course, I've not explicitly said the word "biology" but anyone with atleast an IQ of 10 and some common sense can figure out that I was arguing for biology without me actually explicitly saying "I'm arguing for biology".
This was your response :
Quote:Pool, provide peer reviewed evidence that proves the horse shit you are peddling.
You requested peer reviewed evidence that proves the "horse shit" I was peddling. Of course you didn't explicitly say that you disagreed with me, you did however explicitly imply what I was saying was "horse shit" and demanded proof before you took my position seriously. My position was arguing for biology, your position was arguing for society imposing those standards, it's implicitly implied that we are against each of the others positions.
Of course, now that you have been proved by me that it is biology that has bearing on the standards you mentioned you fall back to school ground girl tactics,asking me to point out where you explicitly said you were arguing against the relevance of biology in the subject. Look who's being disingenuous now.
To summarize:
*You said the standards you mentioned were imposed by society.
*I said it was imposed by biology.
*You wanted evidence for the "horse shit" I was peddling.
*I asked for evidence that support your claim.
*I provide evidence for my claims.
*I ask for evidence that support your claim.
*You give two blog posts as evidence.
*Now you're saying you were never against biology,you were always supporting the role of biology.
*It becomes quite clear how dishonest you are.
*You proceeds to call me a "Fucking liar".
*I ask for evidence that you've yet to provide that support your claim.