Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum?

[Losty]

Wait, you ban male nipples too? Then I don't have anything to worry about!

There's no rule banning nudity or nipples. There's a rule banning pornography. No one, male nor female, is allowed to post anything that is legally considered pornography.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Damn it, foiled again.

[Cyberman]

So I've been combing through the first half of this thread, and it seems to be a lot of the same points over and over, and also boob jokes.  Was there a decision made yet on the policy, or is it still under discussion?

Policy discussions usually take some time

You can be assured that at some undefined time in the future, either something will change, or nothing.

Indeed. Rome wasn't built in a day. One cannot be too hasty at this juncture. When the moment is propitious, in the fullness of time, with all the relevant facts at our disposal, then it might be possible to consider the setting up of a preliminary inquiry, with fairly broad terms of reference, to examine the feasibility of a pilot study into the implications and practicalities of the current proposal viz expanding the existing legislative framework into a somewhat less apparently exclusionary format. Nothing precipitate at this stage, obviously; however, given the current climate and the somewhat understandable nature of the recent public concerns raised in certain forae, it is to be recommended that this investigative committee be granted a remit to fast-track, as it were, its deliberations and present its findings, one way or the other, in or around fifteen years. Give or take. More or less.

[Losty]

Non-pornographic nudity is allowed.

---

---

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Gotta get my missus a dog...

Boru

[bennyboy]

awww my post. . .

bump

[bennyboy]

Non-pornographic nudity is allowed.

What constitutes pornography, though?  How about these?  DO NOT OPEN AT WORK!

Moderator Notice
Images removed for pornography

Clearly, only one of these is specifically sexual in nature, and it's with a FREAKING GOAT, but I think most people would let it slide or even show workmates with a giggle because they are willing to call it "culture."  The other two are of normal people in their birthday suits and are clearly NOT sexual, but some would view them that way.  I mean-- a black man, naked?  Children?  Gasp!  Who gets to draw the standard?

[account_inactive]

Dude, you just posted naked kids.

[Losty]

"por·nog·ra·phy
pôrˈnäɡrəfē/
noun
printed or visual material containing the explicit description or display of sexual organs or activity, intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic or emotional feelings."

The first two contain images of sexual organs and therefore IMO are considered porn. The second one is a statue so it would be classified as art. I suggest editing out the first two super quick because you wouldn't want to upset the powers tha....oh yea that's me...because you wouldn't want to upset me.

[Losty]

Holy fucking Jesus the second one has children.