Where The Hell is C/L Lately?

[KUSA]

1. Actually she is from Brazil.

2. Who do you think is better looking?

But an American citizen.

For me, it takes more than looks to be hot.

Just because you jumped off the bridge, ...................

She is hotter than hot. If you don't think so then you may be gay.

[Edwardo Piet]

Superficially good looking yes, attractive no. IMO making me cringe my face off by causing a huge drama and then playing the victim is a turn off and joking about genital mutilation being okay if you like the look of it kind of ruins the sexy altogether to say the least. It's repugnant. Icky personality can ruin looks. Hard to find how someone looks hot when you associate it with who they are.

In the same way, when someone is fucking awesome it makes them look even more attractive than they already are.

[Jackalope]

This may surprise a lot of you, but EP has a point there.  This place can be pretty hostile to minority opinions and I or one wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of an AF dogpile.

I'm not saying everyone does this - far from it - but the phenomenon exists nonetheless.

Mate, we're the atheists! we ARE the minority!

Fuck -em all! They can take their demented objective reality, their souls and their favourite skyfairies with them.
Let's not feed or cater to the delusion.  We're not helping them  ... Truly.

Who said anything about theists, atheists, thrism or atheism?

[Neo-Scholastic]

Maybe you're a dishonest prick. Maybe.

Yet another example.

[Edwardo Piet]

Quoting me out of context rather demonstrates it.

[Edwardo Piet]

I've seen Chad following some people around the forum antagonising them in every thread for no reason at all,...

Maybe those members and I tend to post on similar threads.

The fact you say "maybe" is very telling. "Maybe I didn't antagonise them on purpose." Well maybe you would know whether you did or not. Maybe you're a dishonest prick. Maybe.

Moderator Notice
Fixed quote tags

[account_inactive]

It's alright, Chad. I still think you're a prick.

[Edwardo Piet]

Maybe he is a dishonest prick who follows people around on threads antagonizing them. Maybe he's honest and lovely and it's mere coincidence and he's not remotely pompous as fuck at all. Who knows?

[Edwardo Piet]

While ignorance that is not willful is unintentional it is still a turn off to me. Willful ignorance is a bigger turn off. Stupidity... 'tis not sexy. I'm not necessarily sexually sapiosexual but I certaintly am sexually anti-dumbshit.

It's why, unlike some... I cannot find Sarah Palin hot. Regardless of how she looks. Nope. Nope just nope.

[emjay]

I also respect theists for coming here, if their motives are honourable. Sadly I don't think most of the ones we get here fall under this heading. Most are here to troll, to preach or just to make themselves feel better by lashing out at atheists.

The ones that do take part in sensible discussions, I have a lot of respect for. The ones that actually take the time to listen I respect even more, but they are a rare breed indeed. I'm not saying they're rare in the world, just they don't tend to come here.

I wonder if it's because they are secure and balanced, and don't feel the need to butt heads with atheists.

Yeah, I do agree with that for the most part now and I think I was very naive before. At the moment tbh I don't trust the motives of any of them but I don't know how much that is my current mood talking... because anger and mistrust go hand in hand... but nonetheless that's how I feel. All I'm seeing at the moment is smuntiness and brick walls... not the same sort of brick walls as my dad... but brick walls all the same... and certainly nothing to idealise.