Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 27, 2024, 2:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[split] Peanut Gallery Commentary-and the drama over the nudity thread continues
#71
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:07 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:04 am)Alex K Wrote: This may be arguing semantics, but is "discrimination against both sexes" a thing?

Probably not. I worded that badly. Yeah it's semantics. I'll rephrase: Limiting both sexes' freedoms and therefore about twice as many people is about twice as bad as limiting the freedom of one sex.

I paraphrase myself and reiterate so many times to try and get the point across I often end up ballsing up by saying something that doesn't make sense, lol. It doesn't discredit all the times I said it correctly though Big Grin

^ Bold mine


Yeah, I know what that's like.


SwIdt ;D
Reply
#72
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:06 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:04 am)Alex K Wrote: This may be arguing semantics, but is "discrimination against both sexes" a thing?

So are you arguing against the idea itself or its phrasing?

I think I'm arguing against the idea, because there are tons of "discriminations against both sexes", but since they affect everyone (and I'm assuming binary gender for simplicity), they are not discrimination but simply social conventions. Not shooting people in the head is a discrimination against both sexes. Speed limits are a discrimination against both sexes.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#73
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:10 am)Alex K Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:06 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: So are you arguing against the idea itself or its phrasing?

I think I'm arguing against the idea, because there are tons of "discriminations against both sexes", but since they affect everyone (and I'm assuming binary gender for simplicity), they are not discrimination but simply social conventions. Not shooting people in the head is a discrimination against both sexes. Speed limits are a discrimination against both sexes.

Not shooting them in the head... what?

Hmm, yes, I think Evie was arguing about something else, though. As in simultaneous, specifically sexist discrimination of the sexes against one another.
Reply
#74
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:13 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:10 am)Alex K Wrote: I think I'm arguing against the idea, because there are tons of "discriminations against both sexes", but since they affect everyone (and I'm assuming binary gender for simplicity), they are not discrimination but simply social conventions. Not shooting people in the head is a discrimination against both sexes. Speed limits are a discrimination against both sexes.

Not shooting them in the head... what?
I was using some random thing that is generally unacceptable in society.
Quote:Hmm, yes, I think Evie was arguing about something else, though. As in simultaneous, specifically sexist discrimination of the sexes against one another.

Forget it, he clarified above
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#75
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
Yeah, I worded that badly.
Reply
#76
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:15 am)Alex K Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:13 am)Excited Penguin Wrote: Not shooting them in the head... what?
I was using some random thing that is generally unacceptable in society.
Quote:Hmm, yes, I think Evie was arguing about something else, though. As in simultaneous, specifically sexist discrimination of the sexes against one another.

Forget it, he clarified above
Not shooting people in the head is unnacceptable where you're from? 

I'm kind of surprised you're still alive then. You must be one tough mtfker.
Reply
#77
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 4:16 am)Excited Penguin Wrote:
(July 4, 2016 at 4:15 am)Alex K Wrote: I was using some random thing that is generally unacceptable in society.

Forget it, he clarified above
Not shooting people in the head is unnacceptable where you're from? 

I'm kind of surprised you're still alive then. You must be one tough mtfker.

I think I worded that badly Tongue
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#78
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
We are discriminated!
Why are Eskimos allowed to club penguins but the rest of the civilised world is not!

That's just ....uncivilised!

hehe
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#79
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
(July 4, 2016 at 1:28 am)Whateverist the White Wrote: Um .. no one has sent me any booby pics. I haz a sad now.

What the fuck, am I chopped liver? I can remove my A69 contributions...
[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]
Reply
#80
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
I still can't get 'em out of my head!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like. Whateverist 4493 692923 March 31, 2021 at 5:55 am
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Nudity, Is It Sexist In This Forum? Heatheness 702 64143 July 7, 2016 at 2:08 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  [split] Discussion About Potential Rule Change and Staff Action Shell B 94 43790 June 2, 2012 at 1:27 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
  [split] Quoting Full Articles Violet 8 3843 April 27, 2010 at 11:34 am
Last Post: Tiberius



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)