Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 7:38 am
(May 20, 2017 at 7:02 am)mh.brewer Wrote: And here I thought it was going to be the "which came first" question. Silly me.
Nah that questions easy . It was the egg . Still don't know why people think it's such a paradox
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 46626
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
108
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 7:40 am
(May 20, 2017 at 7:37 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: so... which came first?
Well, oviparity (egg laying) evolved something over 200 million years ago. Chickens were domesticated from jungle fowl about 10 000 years ago. Thus, the egg came first, and by a considerable margin.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 28504
Threads: 525
Joined: June 16, 2015
Reputation:
89
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 7:47 am
Why did you guys take up the chicken assumption?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
132
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 7:52 am
(May 20, 2017 at 5:14 am)Tizheruk Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 1:48 am)Minimalist Wrote: So, what is the whole egg controversy?
I like mine over-easy. With bacon. To keep the muslims away.
The debate over eggs being good or bad for you
It depends.
If you're a growing child they're definitely good for you.
If you're lacking in nutrition they're definitely good for you.
If you have an egg with toast and orange juice you've got every vitamin and all the nutrition you need right there.
Then on the other hand eggs contain a lot of extra fat and crap you don't need, too.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
90
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 8:06 am
To paraphrase Dr. Steven Novella,
All the nutritional research boils down to this: eat a variety of foods, mostly plants.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 8:09 am
(May 20, 2017 at 7:40 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 7:37 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: so... which came first?
Well, oviparity (egg laying) evolved something over 200 million years ago. Chickens were domesticated from jungle fowl about 10 000 years ago. Thus, the egg came first, and by a considerable margin.
Boru
More like 500,000,000 years ago.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
90
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 8:13 am
(May 20, 2017 at 8:09 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 7:40 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Well, oviparity (egg laying) evolved something over 200 million years ago. Chickens were domesticated from jungle fowl about 10 000 years ago. Thus, the egg came first, and by a considerable margin.
Boru
More like 500,000,000 years ago.
Really? Wow. While 200 mill is too late of course, 500 mill sounds very early! Is the egg-laying back then homologous to today's verterate egg laying?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation:
34
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 10:10 am
(May 20, 2017 at 8:13 am)Alex K Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 8:09 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: More like 500,000,000 years ago.
Really? Wow. While 200 mill is too late of course, 500 mill sounds very early! Is the egg-laying back then homologous to today's verterate egg laying?
Vertebrate egg laying is directly descended from that early egg laying.
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: May 20, 2017 at 10:27 am by Anomalocaris.)
(May 20, 2017 at 8:13 am)Alex K Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 8:09 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: More like 500,000,000 years ago.
Really? Wow. While 200 mill is too late of course, 500 mill sounds very early! Is the egg-laying back then homologous to today's verterate egg laying?
Yes, the earliest known pretty fish like vertebrates that likely laid eggs fish style arose around 500 million years ago.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Stupidiest Anti Science Statement I Have Encountered
May 20, 2017 at 10:49 am
(May 20, 2017 at 5:14 am)Tizheruk Wrote: (May 20, 2017 at 1:48 am)Minimalist Wrote: So, what is the whole egg controversy?
I like mine over-easy. With bacon. To keep the muslims away.
The debate over eggs being good or bad for you
Too much of anything is bad for you. And if you're starving it doesn't matter how many eggs you eat they will only help.
|