We don't take your arguments seriously Dirch because you have nothing to say .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb
Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
|
We don't take your arguments seriously Dirch because you have nothing to say .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb (May 23, 2018 at 11:26 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: We don't take your arguments seriously Dirch because you have nothing to say . Oh, he has plenty to say, but just like some wino on the street, it's just some sort of nonsensical maundering.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
This just in (here recently); the constants of Nature are not changing:
These Physicists Watched a Clock Tick for 14 Years Straight The simpleton in the OP video is simply wrong. (May 23, 2018 at 3:30 pm)Drich Wrote:(May 23, 2018 at 3:22 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Your a scientifically illiterate moron Dirch The consensus seems to be that 'that guy' is scientifically illiterate.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
I had hoped for other things for this thread. Perhaps a discussion of the role of dogma in science ala Thomas Kuhn's scientific revolutions. I take it from some quarters, Kuhn's central thesis is regarded as at best an inaccurate simplification, but I think the question of whether there is such a thing as scientific dogma and what that means may be an interesting one, even if Sheldrake himself is out to lunch.
RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
June 16, 2018 at 9:43 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2018 at 9:52 am by Mister Agenda.)
Maybe you could find someone who isn't out to lunch to illustrate your point? Sometimes it's hard not to get distracted by the source.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
(June 16, 2018 at 9:26 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I had hoped for other things for this thread. Perhaps a discussion of the role of dogma in science ala Thomas Kuhn's scientific revolutions. I take it from some quarters, Kuhn's central thesis is regarded as at best an inaccurate simplification, but I think the question of whether there is such a thing as scientific dogma and what that means may be an interesting one, even if Sheldrake himself is out to lunch. Most scientists prefer Popper to Kuhn: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcatio...ifiability RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
June 16, 2018 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2018 at 10:44 am by Angrboda.)
(June 16, 2018 at 9:56 am)Jehanne Wrote:(June 16, 2018 at 9:26 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: I had hoped for other things for this thread. Perhaps a discussion of the role of dogma in science ala Thomas Kuhn's scientific revolutions. I take it from some quarters, Kuhn's central thesis is regarded as at best an inaccurate simplification, but I think the question of whether there is such a thing as scientific dogma and what that means may be an interesting one, even if Sheldrake himself is out to lunch. I find the section on Feyerabend an interesting stepping stone, for, for example, considering the relationship between language and logic, science and philosophy, and paradoxes in general, perhaps even including the demarcation problem itself. Tarski attempted to avoid the traps of the liar's paradox on the one hand, and deflationary accounts of truth on the other by restricting the expressiveness of language (T-schema). Unfortunately, it seems that the way out of such paradoxes is always meta, always an appeal to things "outside the system." Quote:Feyerabend and Lakatos RE: Banned TED Talk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
June 16, 2018 at 11:44 am
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2018 at 11:48 am by Amarok.)
Quote:Stick to sucking at defending you imaginary friend . Quote:Hey retard, answer the OP's video. Or are you saying that guy is scientifically illiterate as well? Or are you saying anyone who disagrees with you is scientifically illiterate??Why? it not even a real question it's deluded pseudoscience ranting. And yes sheldrake is scientifically illiterate therefore his question is too . Quote:That's a panic stop button you placed on the conversation if I ever saw one.Whatever helps you sleep at night or salves your ego that you and your mystic dingbat are on my level or any level for that matter . Quote:Whew, a second more and everyone would have found out I don't have the chops to hang with Drich or the OP video on this topic. Personal pride saved another christian eats my dust."Lol your funny Dirch if this apologetics thing fails you should become a comedian. (May 24, 2018 at 12:18 am)Fireball Wrote:Your right much better(May 23, 2018 at 11:26 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: We don't take your arguments seriously Dirch because you have nothing to say .
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Let's talk about bias!!! | Quick | 51 | 7615 |
May 14, 2018 at 9:54 pm Last Post: chimp3 |
|
Should we ever foster delusion? | shadow | 36 | 8138 |
July 30, 2017 at 8:02 pm Last Post: bennyboy |
|
Let's talk about morality | EruptedCarcassBloat | 0 | 769 |
October 18, 2016 at 9:20 am Last Post: EruptedCarcassBloat |
|
Ego-- harmful delusion or pragmatic necessity? | bennyboy | 28 | 6802 |
May 6, 2015 at 4:34 am Last Post: Edwardo Piet |
|
My perspective - truth or delusion? | Mystic | 22 | 12092 |
June 10, 2012 at 9:10 am Last Post: genkaus |