Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

It is, actually, lol.  Or at least it was...now it's just a word for grimey ass can-do floridians.  It's even related to the fact that, now, in kentucky, I don't fuck with the derby.  Red Mile is my shit!

Crackers drove supply carts when the rest of the confederate logistic chain had collapsed.  They were too poor to own slaves and regarded by the social elite as white skinned blacks (which many -if not most- were, in fact) - but they got the job done from a place that no one else could make work which was wholly beyond the reach of union forces (or any person not  highly resistant to malaria and other assorted fevers as well as venomous insects/snakes).  

You could hear them coming and going all day and night, the Hoggeville Freight Train.  Upon hearing the sound, people would exclaim..."there go the crackers!".  Most of the horses died en-route, under strain, needing to be replaced leg by leg.

Khemikal, this is absolutely the very first time I have seen you write in a direct, understandable, and informative manner; as if you were sane or something...everything else contains such a large measure of weird, idiosyncratic, commonsenseicalistic/homespun-horseshit, that I am always struggling for air while being inundated with an unfathomable tidal wave on nonsense...Negatio.

Moderator Notice
lol don’t worry it’s not like I have anything better to do during lunch

[Abaddon_ire]

Stupid.

[The Grand Nudger]

Khemikal, this is absolutely the very first time I have seen you write in a direct, understandable, and informative manner; as if you were sane or something...everything else contains such a large measure of weird, idiosyncratic, commonsenseicalistic/homespun-horseshit, that I am always struggling for air while being inundated with an unfathomable tidal wave on nonsense...Negatio.

Blah blah blah.  Do you have any rebuttal to my critique of your argument?

Perhaps, most importantly, an answer to the question of why it would matter if we imagined that your stunted contentions were true..since they won't lead to your preferred conclusion anyway?

[Losty]

You don’t understand the coding but somehow you can add in a random

x

I don’t get it.

[The Grand Nudger]

I do. 

[negatio]

Do you have any rebuttal to my critique of your argument?

Only by so far informing you that I am employing a "truth" as a fundamental axiom supporting the argument, which I sent you.  I have not read it all yet.  I am, as we speak, being busted, am busted by Staff.  I am trying to extract from them precisely what is still missing in my coding, and, I am not hearing back from them at all, yet.  Openly accused them of using double-speak in their dealings with me, and, informed them that it is clear that they have formed a project to ban me, so, I cannot, in all honesty, face any more of your particular, pulling-teeth-to-follow- flippancy, at precisely the time I am under an indictment for "misquoting"; and, of course , given my BB code IQ of 0.00001, I can not even follow what the fuck they are talking about in their Kafkaesque double-speak...

I have got to figure out what, if anything, is missing from the BB code I have, thus far, been typing-in when making Reply. I go:

 
Refer to or quote something from Khemikal; or, just: x.

Address Khemical regarding what I want to say to him. 

I am thinking there could be some tags missing at either end of what I know how to do thus far, that is pissing them off; hell, I got complimented a couple days ago, by staff, for quoting correctly, now, when I use the same exact code, (that worked perfectly recently), I am, now getting busted with practically every post.  It is pretty clear they want me gone, and, it appears to me, at first glance, to be a very bad faith way of kicking me to the curb.  They want me to engage them privately via a special thread; they do not respond...too fucking high and mighty... Negatio





Negatio.

[Angrboda]

And the Little Rik Award for 2018 goes to.....

[Losty]

And the Little Rik Award for 2018 goes to.....

Needs more bunny ears

[The Grand Nudger]

Do you have any rebuttal to my critique of your argument?

Only by so far informing you that I am employing a "truth" as a fundamental axiom supporting the argument, which I sent you. 

Your truth, or fundamental axiom, is irrelevant, because even if it were assumed to be true..it still wouldn't lead to the preferred conclusion.

Do you understand why that's a problem?  

I have not read it all yet.  I am, as we speak, being busted, am busted by Staff.  

I don't give a shit about your forum incompetence.  The incompetence of the argument you posted is what interests me.  So you can save the words and words and words to that effect.

[negatio]

To be honest, quoting someone on this forum is difficult when attempting to edit via the default position.

This is what I do:

After clicking on Reply, I click the button, when hovering over it, states View source(ctrl+shift+s).

It makes it much easier to determine how one can edit.

[quote = "Kit'']
[/quote]
You have totally, totally, lost, lost me here buddy. Is it the same button you are hitting ? You click on Reply, then, hover over the button after just clicking it, and source mode comes up...what good does this do one if one has already replied, your method, then is not for preventing mistake, but just to make editing more efficient. Why would you need editing efficiency after you have already sent the Reply? Negatio.

---

Your truth, or fundamental axiom, is irrelevant, because even if it were assumed to be true..it still wouldn't lead to the preferred conclusion.

Do you understand why that's a problem?  

Your truth, or fundamental axiom, is irrelevant = The most absolutely stuck-on-stupid/insane assertion ever made upon    the face of this earth, i.e., one's fundamental basis for  one's position is irrelevant !!! Fucking total nutcase nonsense!

because even if it were assumed to be true..it still wouldn't lead to the preferred conclusion.  You dip-shit cracker dummy, The axiom employed here, i.e,. All determination is negation; is deemed to be, known to be, infinitely rich, the axiom can lead to an infinite number of indefeasible reasoned arguments for the rest of human history.  The conclusion that Yahweh/Jehovah/Christ are not Deity, is the absolutely INELUCTABLE conclusion!  All your bent cracker pee-brain is capable of is making pure assertion, after pure assertion, after pure assertion; absent reasoned/rational argumentation in support of the anti-thesis position you must posit.

Take out "...determiatio negatio est.."; your flipped-out, Jihadist insulting pee-brain nitwit; you just might pull off a destruction of the most respected, most powerful three words ever enunciated within the known universe. Stupid, fucking crazy stupid, flippant maniac asshole! Negatio.