Ontological Disproof of God

[negatio]

Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here.  That includes:

Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult

You keep claiming I'm mad or angry.  I'm not.  Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more.  What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.

I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post.

[The Grand Nudger]

My son also used to throw fits whenever he didn't get his mashed bananas tut sweet. So I'm sure he knows how dejected and put upon you feel right now. Perhaps you'd like some animal crackers and a juicebox while you wait?

[LadyForCamus]

Negatio is the most painfully boring troll I have ever encountered here at AF.

[The Grand Nudger]

-and we haven't even cracked a hundo yet.  Even with all the help he's been getting from so many well wishers.

[negatio]

Are you actually mentally challenged or something? I’m truly wondering at this point, not even jokingly. You have both mods and long standing members telling you what is, and what isn’t, a rule in the forums.

Yet you’re still arguing. As if we don’t know what’s acceptable in our own stomping grounds. Jesus Christ, dude.

Sir, you are not going to successfully goad/insult me into a communication.  The tone of the attempted communication is so sordid that I can see future communication would be unpleasant for me, because you clearly appear to be another member who cannot do otherwise that entail insult within an interchange.  Your constant insulting train discourages and obviates future interpersonal dialogue.  You will be condescending and unkind... Negatio.

[The Grand Nudger]

The train has no brakes. Are trains without breaks radically free to stop in their tracks?

[negatio]

Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here.  That includes:

Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult

You keep claiming I'm mad or angry.  I'm not.  Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more.  What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.

I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post.

I am engaged in Replying. And, it seems you are continually calling Reply "Quoting"; so, one cannot really tell what on earth you are actually attempting to refer to. I thought Quoting was the earlier disaster when I was using the Quote tab, and inadvertently generating multi-quoting.  Do you guys mean Reply when you say Quoting ?  I think I am trying to learn how to properly Post Reply, not Quote!?  So when you use two terms as synonyms, and, there is really a difference between the two, you are unintentionally both confusing, and, systematically misleading me! 

---

Several people here - myself included - have given you actionable suggestions on how you can help yourself here.  That includes:

Writing an introduction in the Introductions subsection
Engaging with staff in the Questions For Staff subsection instead of bickering/whining with/about them
Learning to competently use the forum software (including formatting posts so they're readable (an empty line between paragraphs))
Providing some background on your ideas, or places/authors/links where one can learn it on their own without insult

You keep claiming I'm mad or angry.  I'm not.  Annoyed perhaps, but nothing more.  What I want to see is if you'll hang yourself with more refusals, weak justifications, and excuses, or if you'll do the mature thing and acknowledge the olive branch that has been repeatedly offered to you.

I have created the special thread for private communication with staff. Of several messages containing questions, answers to which are centrally important to me, thus far, Losty has superficially replied to, not answered, two questions I posed. So, Kevin, that is a false mode/avenue of communication with staff, they are too high and mighty to respond to me; and, that reminds me, I am, given the total irresponsible absence of response from the high and mighty ones, going to post the questions I asked on the open forum, right now, upon a second reply to your post.

You are addressing me in what is known as double-speak, confusing me by speaking simultaneously of one thing as another. Quoting is now something I am avoiding; I am trying to learn Reply(ing). Perhaps you do not realize that speaking to me in a double-speak is confusing. I thought, according to you Losty, that I was Replying correctly, and, now I am not "Quoting" correctly?! It appears you are whipsawing me with double-speak, I am sorry, but that is what it looks like...SHOW ME WHAT IS MISSING NOW IN MY CODING, IS IT SOMETHING AT EACH END OF WHAT I AM DOING NOW? DO NOT BE SO STRINGENT HERE THAT YOU WILL NOT SIMPLY SHOW ME THE PROPER EQUATION/CODE. Is this your way of trying to teach me something?

[LadyForCamus]

It hurts. It physically hurts.

[KevinM1]

I dunno... there's a certain art to whining at me about the difference in replying vs. quoting when nothing in my previous post even directly mentioned it, and instead explicitly mentioned poorly formatted paragraphs

[negatio]

I dunno... there's a certain art to whining at me about the difference in replying vs. quoting when nothing in my previous post even directly mentioned it, and instead explicitly mentioned poorly formatted paragraphs

No Kevin, that is the content of one of the private thread questions to staff; it is not meant for you, and there is another one there that I sent you, which mentions systematical misleadingness.
Negatio.