Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 9:21 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ontological Disproof of God
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Losty Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 8:40 pm)negatio Wrote: Losty
What luck was that ?
Positivio

The phrase “sorry bout your luck” is sometimes used to tell someone they’re not going to get what they want. In this case I was referring to me being sweet. I am sweet when I want to be but I am not required to be sweet.

I, however, am sweet all the time. Right, guys?

Guys?
[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 8:50 pm)Losty Wrote: The phrase “sorry bout your luck” is sometimes used to tell someone they’re not going to get what they want. In this case I was referring to me being sweet. I am sweet when I want to be but I am not required to be sweet.

I, however, am sweet all the time. Right, guys?

Guys?

*crickets*



😛
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[Image: coloring-pages-numbers-100.jpg]
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
emjay
You are way way out on a limb there.

Now, you place me under the necessity to return to the rule issue.

The Introductions Forum is the most rudimentary, beginning, basic, fundamental, bottom-ground sector of the forum; and, the rule written for that forum disallows insulting new members;

and, a portion of rule posited in language written for protecting new members from insult, is, for the head honchos of the forum to go on to say, because new members do appear in

other sectors of the overall forum, you (I. e., members), shall not take the prohibition on insult within the Introductory Forum to mean that you can run your fucking mouth via insult in

all other the other sectors of the forum. What could be more kind; rational; and, reasonable of the big mucky mucks to say; they are being so noble, so nice, saying, be nice at all times

to new members, if you think you see a troll do not be unkind to him or her, be nice, be sweet at all times, do not employ insult in an attempt to handle the situation yourself, refer the

matter to staff; a radically reasonable and beautiful rule, I. e., shut up, do not shoot your insulting mouth off for, we, the ownership, do not actually endorse members engaging in inter-

insult anywhere within our forum. Ownership has not said anything about tempers flaring...rational, mature human beings do not proceed via insult, it is so simple, ownership is noble,

they do not play the insult card, and, within their forum, no one will, shall, play the card. Insult is actually forbidden by the rule written for the most foundational sector of the forum, the

Introductions Forum, and, the owners are saying that they are extending the rule extant within the Introductions Forum throughout the realm that is the entire Atheist Forum, because

ownership actually desires their entire forum to proceed absent insulting behavior, for to proceed via insult merely exhibits one's ignorance; ignobility; and stupidity;---noble human beings

do not require insult to interact with their fellow human beings. Positivio P.S. Now, noble fellow forum members, what is you pleasure, what, if anything, do you wish to engage, in

noble linguistic dialogical interaction regarding Negatio's purported disproof of Deity, and proceed, as per order of staff, to a return to a discussion of Negatio's theory of the

non-existence of Deity as Deity is now thought, across our world, to be ?
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
OH MY GOD; WILL YOU TALK ABOUT THE GOD-DAMNED OP ALREADY?!
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
Double spacing every line now... beautiful touch
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 9:08 pm)negatio Wrote: emjay
You are way way out on a limb there.

Now, you place me under the necessity to return to the rule issue.

The Introductions Forum is the most rudimentary, beginning, basic, fundamental, bottom-ground sector of the forum; and, the rule written for that forum disallows insulting new members;

and, a portion of rule posited in language written for protecting new members from insult, is, for the head honchos of the forum to go on to say, because new members do appear in

other sectors of the overall forum, you (I. e., members), shall not take the prohibition on insult within the Introductory Forum to mean that you can run your fucking mouth via insult in

all other the other sectors of the forum. What could be more kind; rational; and, reasonable of the big mucky mucks to say; they are being so noble, so nice, saying, be nice at all times

to new members, if you think you see a troll do not be unkind to him or her, be nice, be sweet at all times, do not employ insult in an attempt to handle the situation yourself, refer the

matter to staff; a radically reasonable and beautiful rule, I. e., shut up, do not shoot your insulting mouth off for, we, the ownership, do not actually endorse members engaging in inter-

insult anywhere within our forum. Ownership has not said anything about tempers flaring...rational, mature human beings do not proceed via insult, it is so simple, ownership is noble,

they do not play the insult card, and, within their forum, no one will, shall, play the card. Insult is actually forbidden by the rule written for the most foundational sector of the forum, the

Introductions Forum, and, the owners are saying that they are extending the rule extant within the Introductions Forum throughout the realm that is the entire Atheist Forum, because

ownership actually desires their entire forum to proceed absent insulting behavior, for to proceed via insult merely exhibits one's ignorance; ignobility; and stupidity;---noble human beings

do not require insult to interact with their fellow human beings.

Of course civility is preferred, but it doesn't always happen, especially in the heat of argument or frustration. Just read the damn rules.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
[Image: 8935_B2_A0_E891_4_C7_F_B02_B_111857_FA11_DF.jpg]
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 9:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:
(September 13, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote: I, however, am sweet all the time. Right, guys?

Guys?

*crickets*



😛

Ah, well, can’t blame a guy for trying. I’m nice at least 40% of the time.
[Image: bbb59Ce.gif]

(September 17, 2015 at 4:04 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: I make change in the coin tendered. If you want courteous treatment, behave courteously. Preaching at me and calling me immoral is not courteous behavior.
Reply
RE: Ontological Disproof of God
(September 13, 2018 at 8:52 pm)Bob Kelso Wrote: I, however, am sweet all the time. Right, guys?

Guys?

I'm not sure. Do you have something that I can lick that's not to inappropriate?

(September 13, 2018 at 9:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Double spacing every line now... beautiful touch

It's a sign of superior intelligence.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The classic ontological argument Modern Atheism 20 1056 October 3, 2024 at 12:45 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The modal ontological argument for God Disagreeable 29 1697 August 10, 2024 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: CuriosityBob
  My own moral + ontological argument. Mystic 37 12440 April 17, 2018 at 12:50 pm
Last Post: FatAndFaithless
  Ontological Limericks chimp3 12 3723 December 22, 2016 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  On Anselm's 2nd Formulation of the Ontological Argument FallentoReason 7 3457 November 21, 2016 at 10:57 am
Last Post: FallentoReason
  How would you describe your ontological views? The Skeptic 10 3290 July 29, 2014 at 11:28 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Ontological Arguments - A Comprehensive Refutation MindForgedManacle 23 6443 March 20, 2014 at 1:48 am
Last Post: Rabb Allah
  The Modal Ontological Argument - Without Modal Logic Rational AKD 82 34893 February 17, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  The modal ontological argument - without modal logic proves atheism max-greece 15 5985 February 14, 2014 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  The Ontological Argument MindForgedManacle 18 6777 August 22, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Last Post: Jackalope



Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)