Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 30, 2024, 6:08 pm
Thread Rating:
The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
|
RE: The Norman Conquest of England is a bs narrative
September 3, 2021 at 2:52 pm
(This post was last modified: September 3, 2021 at 3:02 pm by brewer.)
Norman's conquest of Vera was much more fun.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
(September 3, 2021 at 2:52 pm)brewer Wrote: Norman's conquest of Vera was much more fun. ‘What’s shaking, Mister Peterson?’ ‘All four cheeks and a couple of chins, Woody.’ Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
I believe this. I've played the scenario enough to know.
As Harald Hardrada, you begin poised to seize York; take it; and work to Nottingham. Win there and you have iron to win. As Sweyn II, having lower numbers and more opposition at landings, it's tough to take enough ground to buy time. But if you do, London is right there. As Godwinson, it's crucial to know there are horsemen crossing from the south. Thanks to the bs narrative, you know to defend those sea towns first. Once the coin for housecarls kicks in, London is safe. As William, cross. Sucha buncha shit. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)