Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 27, 2024, 7:43 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
#1
Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
I took this image in August, 2010. It was my first attempt at a long exposure widefield image of a part of the Milky Way. This photo was taken with my Hutech modified Canon T1i using the standard 18-55mm lens, set at 55mm, f5. The image is a stack of 12 x 3 minute exposures for a total of 36 minutes exposure. I didn't work on this for a long time because I hated the result, but have since figured out how to get a better result. Still, it isnt as good as it could be. I had fog roll in (which is the milky streaks you see in the image), and the lens isn't a very good one, as it doesn't focus as well as you'd expect from such an expensive camera, it has vignetting, and is not a flat field. But for my first widefield long exposure of the Milky Way, I think I could have done a lot worse. Anyway, here it is for your amusement/enjoyment:

[Image: cygnus-1.jpg]
Cygnus Region Of The Milky Way, as seen from Taylorsville Lake, Kentucky
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#2
RE: Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
... still a really cool photograph.
Reply
#3
RE: Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
You know, Oro, I look at that picture and it rams home the fact that if the nut jobs really believe in a god who made life here only that he would have to be one wasteful son of a bitch.
Reply
#4
RE: Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
(December 28, 2011 at 2:27 am)Minimalist Wrote: You know, Oro, I look at that picture and it rams home the fact that if the nut jobs really believe in a god who made life here only that he would have to be one wasteful son of a bitch.

Well, like Carl Sagan said, if it is just us, it is an awful waste of space. And this image is just the Cygnus/Vulpecula region of the Milky way. It does include the region that the Kepler Space probe is looking at trying to find exo-planets.

[Image: kepler_fov.jpg]
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens

"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".

- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "

- Dr. Donald Prothero
Reply
#5
RE: Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
Quote:Well, like Carl Sagan said, if it is just us, it is an awful waste of space.


Amen to that.



Oops.
Reply
#6
RE: Attempt at widefield galactic imaging
Its better than anything I could manage. Clap


(December 28, 2011 at 2:27 am)Minimalist Wrote: You know, Oro, I look at that picture and it rams home the fact that if the nut jobs really believe in a god who made life here only that he would have to be one wasteful son of a bitch.
The same arsehole deity who put all our natural resources such as coal, limestone and tin deep underground so we'd have no choice but to risk our one-and-only lives trying to mine it to the surface just to survive?

The same cosmic cunt who made us so ridiculously infinitesimal that we feel nauseous with the apprehension that we really don't matter whenever we stare up at the vast cosmos?

The same creator that rendered life meaningless with the certainty of death?

If God exists, he's either a buffoon or omnimalevolent.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Teaching myself physics, is this a futile attempt? liam 14 8889 June 21, 2012 at 8:42 pm
Last Post: Cato
  Imaging our galaxy oxymoron 0 1045 March 29, 2012 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: oxymoron
  My Latest astrophoto attempt at Messier 42 orogenicman 14 5422 February 21, 2012 at 11:10 am
Last Post: MarkOfEnglandshire



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)