Royksopp - What Else Is There? - Song

[fr0d0]

You need to read the convo again then Evie, as that is the conclusion you are attacking.

[Edwardo Piet]

You said you disagreed that atheism was proving to be logically in error as referred to by your sig. I asked YOU to provide proofs of that. PROVE a positive. Not a Rhiz is trying to spin it for you to slither out of.

Just to quote this again...


...

1. You say that I made a positive claim that I never made.
2. You "attacked" first if anyone did. You said first that "Well apparently it's the atheists who hold hold the errors.", I then questioned you on that.

EvF

[fr0d0]

Now you are doing a 'me' and missing quotes???

[Edwardo Piet]

You claimed I made a positive claim when I didn't. And then you are the one who began saying that atheists are 'the ones who hold errors' and all I did was question that. Quite ironic perhaps.

EvF

[fr0d0]

We don't need links as we both know what we're on about and you have already conceded some nice points and we're done really.

[Edwardo Piet]

1. I really don't know what you are referring to when you say we 'both know what we are talking about'.

2. What points did I concede? What are you referring to there?

3.

1. You say that I made a positive claim that I never made.
2. You "attacked" first if anyone did. You said first that "Well apparently it's the atheists who hold hold the errors.", I then questioned you on that.

You made a false claim and if anyone attacked, it's arguably more you than me, since all I did was question your claim/suggestion about atheists.

4. We can be "done" if you like, but I believe I have shown that you have made a strawman out of me by saying I claimed something that I never claimed, and you failed to back up the fact that you think atheists 'are the one's who hold the errors'...the fact that I question that doesn't mean the burden is on me, I didn't make any positive claim there.

EvF

[fr0d0]

Funny we discussed it and put it to bed then.

[Edwardo Piet]

Well I maintain my right to believe that I, indeed, pointed out you made false claim that I made a claim that I did not (made a strawman out of me), and you failed to back up your claim that "Well apparently it's the atheists who hold hold the errors." You accused me of making a positive claim against this, when all I did was question it, the claim you made.

Okay, we're done? Or do you wanna respond?

And if you wanna end this then, at first you'd like to concede the false claim you made about me, and admit you have failed to back up yours?

EvF

[fr0d0]

No you're making all this up. We had a convo and you said your piece following mine. You've added all this shit subsequently and none of it bears any resemblance to the convo.. how can you accuse me of making a strawman when you also say you don't understand what I've said??? You picked up on Rhizzo's point hoping to point score and now you want blood. Wake up Evie - ain't gonna happen.

[Edwardo Piet]

You said you disagreed that atheism was proving to be logically in error as referred to by your sig. I asked YOU to provide proofs of that. PROVE a positive.

This is the strawman you made of me - I never made that claim. So no, I'm not making it up.

The part that I don't know what you are talking about, is your own hints at atheists somehow being 'the ones who are in error', which you have failed to back up. All I did was question it.

EvF