What full retard looks like...

[Zen Badger]

And people wonder why Dawkins refuses to debate with these morons.

[Justtristo]

So this is trending on reddit at the moment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFjoEgYOgRo

I remember the time I first watched I had to click off the video, too much stupid hurts. Fuck watching another 6 of these.

Still, it's good for a laugh. And to realise just how mindlessly brainwashed some people are.

I usually put religious fanatics into either of two categories,

The first category are the well meaning, however pig ignorant types.
The second category are either dishonest and/or downright scary, because they are not pig ignorant.

That lady is in the second category I am afraid.

[LastPoet]

Dumb people like this remind of...
...

I resent that because you are denegrating that noble beast species! A donkey, or a 'burro', can't be that dumb! Besides to the contrary of the jesus freaks, they are an endangered species.

[Faith No More]

That lady is phony as hell. Everything about her demeanor appears forced and fake.

[Esquilax]

I usually put religious fanatics into either of two categories,

The first category are the well meaning, however pig ignorant types.
The second category are either dishonest and/or downright scary, because they are not pig ignorant.

That lady is in the second category I am afraid.

I've been toying with the idea of making a youtube series reviewing creationists, across a number of categories, in terms of ferreting out precisely which of those two categories they fall into. Though I'd add a third, beyond simply being dumb or lying; the pious types that are intelligent, just locked into their dogma.

This lady is definitely just being dishonest, though.

[Napoléon]

I usually put religious fanatics into either of two categories,

The first category are the well meaning, however pig ignorant types.
The second category are either dishonest and/or downright scary, because they are not pig ignorant.

That lady is in the second category I am afraid.

Most definitely.

She comes across like some fake suburban mom who hands out cookies to kids, but when she invites them into her house she pinches their skin and plays horrible pranks on them.

Vile woman.

[Violet]

I thought that this was years ago... how can it be trending recently? 0.o

Either I'm having serious deja vu... or something's up. STAND DOWN KIM, fucking eh. PUT ON SOME CLOTHES!

Can some Korean translate this shit? That is not something I want to see.

[Darkstar]

I actually watched all seven parts...does that make me a masochist? It was like a train wreck; terrible, but you can't look away.

All arguments summarized (paraphrasing):

---

1.Wright: If evolution were true, there would be evidence of macroevolution.

Dawkins: There is.

Wright: There are no transitional forms.

Dawkins: All forms are transitional.

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] I mean real evidence. Why are scientists hiding the evidence against evolution?

Dawkins points out the transitional fossils from earlier monkeys to homo sapiens.

Wright: Piltdown man, therefore evolution is entirely fraudulent. Why are scientists hiding the evidence against evolution?

Dawkins: Go to a museum, it's all there.

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] I've never seen it at the museums I've been to [what? the creation museum?] Therefore it doesn't exist.

Dawkins: Go to a museum, it's all there.

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] As I was saying...[transition to another "argument"]

---

2.Wright: God created people to be unique individuals, therefore evolution is false.

Dawkins: Evolution can only be true if people are unique.

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] As I was saying...[transition to another "argument"]

---

3Wright: Social Darwinism, therefore evolution is false.

Dawkins: Social Darwinism is a misapplication of Darwinism.

Wright: But a society run on Darwin would be bad.

Dawkins: I agree. Do you have an agenda against evolution that makes you deny scientific facts because of Social Darwinism?

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] What are you talking about? As I was saying...[transition to another "argument"]

---

4.Wright: People have made errors in evolutionary theory. Why don't you teach the controversy?

Dawkins: Those errors have been corrected. That's what science does.

Wright: Why are scientists hiding the evidence against evolution?

Dawkins: They aren't. There is none. There is no controversy among credible scientists.

Wright: [nervous/fake laugh] As I was saying...[transition to another "argument"]

---

That and some nonsense about people's souls...

---

Yeah, she repeated the same debunked points a lot. And she emphasized creaTOR for some reason. And, yes, whenever she had her fake laugh, it was a "Dawkins just debunked her" alarm.