Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 6:55 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Paranormal Challenge
#11
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
People such Sylvia Brown and James Van Praagh are fakes and Randi has demonstrated this to be the case, but we knew they were anyway.
Come all ye faithful joyful and triumphant.
Reply
#12
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
Then there was Dr. Hovind's $100,000 challenge to prove evolution. Of course it was so biased and slanted that there's no way anyone could ever prove it, because to win you'd have to prove straw man arguments as real, including cosmology, abiogenesis, and perhaps a couple other things which have nothing to do with evolution, and IIRC one part of it was that you had to prove that evolution is the only way that life could have developed on this planet and not through God's magic. Then, even if someone were up to the challenge, the judges were creationist preachers or friends of Hovind. And finally, it was not even proven that Hovind had the $100,000 in the first place.

Kind of stacking the deck like someone tried to do here in a formal debate.
Christian apologetics is the art of rolling a dog turd in sugar and selling it as a donut.
Reply
#13
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
[/quote]
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#14
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
(October 10, 2013 at 2:01 am)Beta Ray Bill Wrote: I figure this is old news, but since I can't find a thread for it, I'll make one.

"In 1964, Randi began offering a prize of $US1000 to anyone who could demonstrate a paranormal ability under agreed-upon testing conditions. This prize has since been increased to $US1 million in bonds and is now administered by the JREF as the One Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge. Since its inception, more than 1000 people have applied to be tested. To date no one has either been able to demonstrate their claimed abilities under the testing conditions or have not fulfilled the foundation conditions for taking the test; the prize money still remains to be claimed."

I think that is a definant score for science, and a smack to faith.

Science would tell you that a lack of evidence either way means we do not know.

As much as something cannot be proved without evidence it cannot be disproved without the evidence to disprove it.

Clearly not a win for the principles of scientific theory.


MM
"The greatest deception men suffer is from their own opinions" - Leonardo da Vinci

"I think I use the term “radical” rather loosely, just for emphasis. If you describe yourself as “atheist,” some people will say, “Don’t you mean ‘agnostic’?” I have to reply that I really do mean atheist, I really do not believe that there is a god; in fact, I am convinced that there is not a god (a subtle difference). I see not a shred of evidence to suggest that there is one ... etc., etc. It’s easier to say that I am a radical atheist, just to signal that I really mean it, have thought about it a great deal, and that it’s an opinion I hold seriously." - Douglas Adams (and I echo the sentiment)
Reply
#15
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
Quote:Not really as it only demonstrates that humans don't appear have the ability to harness and control the supernatural at their own whim.

But that is precisely the claim that is being made and tested. Dowsers, telekinetics, 'readers' and so on are all so confident in their abilities to do just that, that they are (largely) allowed to design their own tests.


Quote:These things will only occur by the grace of God.

Then God must be pretty well graceless.

Quote:That said many ordinary people do often experience strange and unusual phenomenon.

Agreed.

Quote:For instance when grandmother fell down the the stairs and broke her leg my mother knew something was wrong and called for some to check on her.

So...your mum was worried about an elderly relative who (it appears) lives alone? Mate, this isn't paranormal, this is simply normal. Sadly, this exact situation is often used as 'evidence' of psychic phenomena: So-and-so is worried about such-and-such, so makes a call or a visit to find out that such and such has had a fall, or a car crash, or has been diagnosed with cancer. Compassionate concern, however, does not a paranormal experience make. For instance, did your mum say something like, 'Oh, dear - I just got this horrid feeling that Gran tripped on the 6th stair from the top, fell, and fractured her right tibia in three places, and sustained minor bruising to her right shoulder'? I doubt it. More likely, you mum calls often to check on the old dear, and got a 'hit' (no pun intended).



Quote:But this isn't something you can test and analyse in Randi's lab so she won't win his million dollar prize.

True enough, but only because the JREF isn't testing for lucky guesses.

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#16
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
(October 10, 2013 at 2:50 pm)Doubting Thomas Wrote: Funny how psychic abilities always seem to totally diminish in laboratory controlled conditions.

I figure it's similar to why people freeze up when attempting a BM in a public restroom.

Ok, bad analogy, well...except for the full of shit part.
Reply
#17
RE: The Paranormal Challenge
(October 10, 2013 at 4:00 pm)Tonus Wrote:
(October 10, 2013 at 8:28 am)Sword of Christ Wrote: Not really as it only demonstrates that humans don't appear have the ability to harness and control the supernatural at their own whim.

What is noteworthy to me is that so many people believe those claims anyway.

A couple months back I was saddled with watching a broadcast of Peter Popoff's ministry. People are still sending him money, believe it or not.


[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Find the Supernova Challenge orogenicman 5 2532 April 20, 2012 at 5:42 pm
Last Post: orogenicman



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)