I need a volunteer

[No_God]

I didn't actually read all the way up. I thought you were trying to tell us to prove the afterlife didn't exist. But yes, as far as the afterlife goes, I don't know.

[Bad Wolf]

And yet again enrico goes above and beyond my expectations of stupidity

[Cyberman]

I'm a zombie with over three years membership who just so happens to have racked up nearly nine thousand posts with a kudos ratio of 2.25, a reputation rating forty-three times yours and regarded well enough by the community to have been offered a Staff position. Misrepresenting my character in an attempt to discredit my words - an ad hominem attack - only results in judgement being drawn about your own.

You are very funny Stimbo.
Go in a Theist forum and see how many kudos you will get.
Sometime ago i have been in the catholic forum.
I lasted just over one month before they kicked me out.
Don't you think it is natural to be welcome in a forum in which you agree with their policy?

I will not be deflected by your red herrings, except inasmuch to deliver the following for your education: if I make no comment about another member's post when I am addressing yours, the intellectually honest position is to form no opinion at all about my motives. That you have chosen to do the opposite is most revealing.

You can do whatever you like but this is not the real spirit of a forum in which there suppose to exist an exchange of ideas all around.
I always try my best to answer to everybody unless i agree with what they say.

Or they ask you anything pertaining to what you assert. You still haven't approached anything like an answer to the question of who these alleged eyewitnesses to JC were. In fact you're running ever closer to a breach of Forum Rule #1.

]No, you stated that there were many such witnesses, without offering any further details. I asked you to name some of them. Why is this so hard for you to get through your skull? Could it be (gasp; horror) that you have nothing more to offer than bald and baseless assertions in a futile attempt to appear learned?

I already answered this question telling you that i believe in what is written in the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ.
If you don't believe in what is written you are free to provide evidence that this book say bullshit.
I follow logic and what is written in this book follow logic.

Logic doesn't prove anything. Logic simply organises whatever data you feed into it; if you feed bullshit in, you get bullshit out. Name the names or concede that you have nothing of substance.

How can you justify claiming that these early xtians wouldn't have suffered and died (evidence for which is nonexistent anyway) unless Jesus was a tremendous spiritual teacher? What about the 9/11 hijackers? Would they have died for a lie?

Where is the evidence that there were hijackers?

Are you seriously claiming there weren't any hijackers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ay3w2ijwws

Regardless, those aeroplanes were diverted into the World Trade Centre. The simplest explanation is that they were hijacked - a fact confirmed by telephone calls made by passengers and crew on those doomed flights, viz:

(Warning: potentially disturbing material.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Tr0u35Tek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYBhgEm3j7A

Now give your evidence for eyewitnesses to JC's 'miracles' that is at least equal to that.

On the contrary there is evidence that 3 Israeli agents were watching with the binoculars the twin towers and as soon as the planes hit the towers they jump up in the air in joy.

Then present it here for discussion, as I did above. Or retract it if you can't for whatever reason.

I could supply testimonials that penis enlargers and Nigerian princes are genuine. In order for anyone to take them seriously, first you need to demonstrate that they are credible and even then there has to be independent corroborating evidence; particularly when the only reference to these witnesses is one brief passage in one source book of highly dubious credibility.

Of course.
Everything that does not go along with your believes is highly dubious.
What's new Stimbo!

Another ad hom. Address the points or I shall report you for violation of Forum Rule #1.

[Little Rik]

Address the points or I shall report you for violation of Forum Rule #1.

Get real little boy.
You can either report me and try to get rid of me or you can grow up and deal with life in the hope you can get rid of your dogmas instead.
Rule #1 also say......members should interact with each other in a proper discussion, and not purposely / repeatedly evade rebuttals made to them. .............
1) Few post ago when R.Salesman talk about Greek mythology instead of INTERACT also with him you jump on my back like a mad monkey for something else ignoring the INTERACTION with other members.
This show that you are not interested in interacting with other member.
All you are interested is trying to throw mud on me.
2) You asked me to produce witness when i said that thousand of people witness Jesus extraordinary things.
I said to you that i believe what is written in the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ because what is written goes along with what other spiritual being like Shiva and Krishna were saying and because the first Christians had an extraordinary mental and spiritual strength which had to come from an extraordinary figure like Jesus so it is natural that an extraordinary person can do extraordinary things.
So you can not say that i evade your question.
All you can say is that you do not believe what i said.
The rule #1 only say that .............Whilst members are not forced or required to answer every post addressed to them, ignoring them all and continuing to post similar content will fall in line with our "No Spam" rule. This includes posting links / copy-pasted content / scripture verses repeatedly, without adding your own comments or being relevant to the thread..................
As you can see the rule say not to IGNORE to answer not to answer in the way that please you or not.
The same things goes for the 9/11.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE...aelis.html

I believe what these people are saying.
If you don't that is your problem not mine.

[Bad Wolf]

Actually rule #1 pretty much sums up your entire time here. I'm surprised you haven't been banned already.

[Angrboda]

Actually rule #1 pretty much sums up your entire time here. I'm surprised you haven't been banned already.

In fairness to him, it's obvious he does attempt to interact, albeit in a way that's hard to distinguish from mere evasiveness. He's more of a borderline case.

[Bad Wolf]

Oh he does interact, he just doesn't answer any questions or if he does, he gives an answer that reveals nothing or one that doens't answer the question asked

[Jacob(smooth)]

In his own mind, he IS answering. He's not deliberately evasive, just... Differently aware.

---

Also, you can't argue with the 9/11 thing. The site clearly says "what really happened". Duh.

Shame on you for not believing what you read on the Internet Stimbo.

[Little Rik]

Actually rule #1 pretty much sums up your entire time here. I'm surprised you haven't been banned already.

In fairness to him, it's obvious he does attempt to interact, albeit in a way that's hard to distinguish from mere evasiveness. He's more of a borderline case.

Look rasetsu, i know that you are a very intelligent yogini after all you said.........I am a Yogini, darling. I am a master......and then........I achieved union with the Shakti at the age of 4 without a teacher...... .....so considering your tremendous knowledge i would like to ask you if you see any logic in Stimbo fairness when he asked me to give evidence about the thousand of witness that saw Jesus do extraordinary things and at the same time he totaly ignore The R.Salesmann when he say.............Hundreds of thousands witness the acts of the Zeus and Neptune. Odysseus left behind his legacy in The odyssey as written by Homer
Let me see if we find some logic explanation for Stimbo not interact with R.Salesman.
1) Maybe Stimbo believe that the Greek mythology was not mythology at all but things that really happened so there wouldn't be the need to ask for witness?
2) Maybe Stimbo didn't interact with R.Salesman because he didn't see his post?
3) Maybe Stimbo ignore what R.Salesman wrote because he didn't want to upset a mate.
4) Maybe Stimbo was so angry with me that the only things that he was looking for was to jump on my back like a mad monkey and all the rest didn't really matter?
5) Maybe, maybe i do not know that is why i ask you to enlighten me.
As a master in yoga it should not be difficult for you to answer me.
Please don't let me wait and suffer more.

[Bad Wolf]

Are you being serious now? How can you not understand this? RealitySalesman was making a joke to try and prove a point. He was pointing out how hundreds of thousands of people claim to have witnessed the greek gods, just like hundreds of thousands of people claim to have witnessed jesus. He doesn't actually believe in them.
The point was to get you thinking. Why do you not believe in the greek gods? They also have witnesses, because apparently that is enough for you to believe, like you do with jesus. So why is Jesus Christ more likely than the greek gods?