Just a quick poll to see where everyone stands on this question.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 12, 2024, 5:30 am
Poll: What can science prove? This poll is closed. |
|||
Absolutely Everything. | 8 | 18.60% | |
Certain things (like things in the empirical / material realm) | 18 | 41.86% | |
Absolutely Nothing. | 17 | 39.53% | |
Total | 43 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Thread Rating:
What can science prove?
|
RE: What can science prove?
March 13, 2010 at 4:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 13, 2010 at 4:12 pm by LukeMC.)
I see no poll
EDIT:**okay i see it now
Nothing.
...
I take it you mean "prove" in the definite, absolute sense of the word?
Nothing. It can only find evidence to support its theories but as soon as new evidence comes along to challenge your theory you must either change or reject the theory.
Though one could go further and say that you cannot prove anything (as things exist outside of logic)... I understood the nature of the question to mean proof as it is commonly understood... although it is true that 'proof' may not be possible
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
Science is not an entity. It is only as sound as its human users. Science can prove evolution to one group of people and disprove it to another. The only thing science can really prove is that mankind can make it prove whatever it wants.
"On Earth as it is in Heaven, the Cosmic Roots of the Bible" available on the Amazon.
Depends on what you're trying to prove, and absolute certainty is quintessentially, an ogre of wasted effort whether arguing for true or false.
All that matters is that its useful in making predictions based on scientific observations of past events.
Absolutely? Nothing .
For daily use? Much Last night I saw an amazing programme on the construction of the Sydney Opera House and how science was used in its construction: EG: it is constructed using concrete ribs and precast concrete section,held together with post tensioned internal steel cables and epoxy resin. The massive glass windows are made of laminated glass. The air conditioning system uses seawater from Sydney Harbour.The problem of corrosion by the seawater is manage by using zinca as a 'sacrifice' metal. The internal avcoustics are achieved by an internal shell mad eof plywood. My point: Whether science proves anything absolutely is irrelevant to me. Science provides me with an explanation of the world and for every tool I use. For me,a non scientist, science is both pragmatic and rational. Religion is neither.. Yes, there gaps,and that's OK. I don't claim or need to have an answer for everything.I need only enough to live as a the human being I am. Learning is a constant and unending joy. Quote:Sydney Opera House is a modern expressionist design, with a series of large precast concrete "shells",[4] each composed of sections of a hemisphere of the same radius, forming the roofs of the structure, set on a monumental podium. The building covers 1.8 hectares (4.5 acres) of land and is 183 metres (605 ft) long and 120 metres (388 ft) wide at its widest point. It is supported on 588 concrete piers sunk as much as 25 metres below sea level. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Opera_House
I didnt feel tempted to tick any of those boxes, am I alone?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid. Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Do the multiverse theories prove the existence of... | Mudhammam | 3 | 2353 |
January 12, 2014 at 12:03 pm Last Post: Esquilax |
|
The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science | FifthElement | 23 | 8472 |
June 25, 2013 at 10:54 am Last Post: Rahul |
|
We can dare to dream of the stars again, if only we can achieve this small thing. | Annik | 49 | 19225 |
May 17, 2012 at 5:21 pm Last Post: Angrboda |
|
Science Laughs: Science Comedian Brian Malow | orogenicman | 4 | 4497 |
December 10, 2010 at 12:06 pm Last Post: Lethe |
Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)