Login

**Silver** · April 15, 2015 at 1:58 am

It's simple really. The teapot does not exist.

**robvalue** · April 15, 2015 at 2:39 am

The tea pot existing is not something that appeals to me.

So it doesn't exist.

Homeless Nutter · April 15, 2015 at 7:59 am

(April 14, 2015 at 2:04 pm)Pizza Wrote: But cats do exist; therefore, Russell's teapot exists.

Nope. There's no such thing as cats. Jesus told me so. What you think of as "cats" are in fact small, whiny dogs, made by Satan to test our faith.

**robvalue** · April 15, 2015 at 8:07 am

Beverage related religion is cool.

**Alex K** · April 15, 2015 at 8:10 am

I don't think the argument is even futed yet. Non need to refute it already.

**robvalue** · April 15, 2015 at 9:14 am

But cats can exist outside of time, and teapots can ignore premise #4 and premise #9. Cats in teapots get +3 defense roll.

Pizza · April 15, 2015 at 9:49 am

How do you account for logic without the Teapot?

**robvalue** · April 15, 2015 at 10:05 am

3 hours before time began, the cat invented logic out of a ball of string.

Pizza · April 15, 2015 at 10:13 am

I think i'm an ateapotist now.

**Alex K** · (This post was last modified: April 15, 2015 at 10:49 am by Alex K.)

(April 15, 2015 at 10:13 am)Pizza Wrote: I think i'm an ateapotist now.

Impossible because without a teapot there is no logic. Presuppotitionalism FTW