Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 21, 2024, 9:25 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
(May 11, 2011 at 8:27 am)Gawdzilla Wrote:
(May 11, 2011 at 8:25 am)tackattack Wrote: Everyone has a bias, and it's usually emotional by nature. I know of no one except a computer AI that can claim no bias, but that's usually been programmed with some bias. Slander, libel and calumny are specifically taught against in Christianity, unfortunately, peeople more ofthen than not, only use and see what they want to and what furthers their own intentions.

So that justifies them using it against a scientific process? Really?

no of course not. Bias is a part of the scientific process. I seek to overcome it at every opportunity, as do you. I wasn't justifying, but explaining. It does make me upset when blatant emotionalism is used to defend or retort evidence or logical arguements. It is unfortunate that it happens so often on both sides.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
(May 11, 2011 at 9:19 am)tackattack Wrote: It is unfortunate that it happens so often on both sides.
Show me.
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
A large universe with millions of planets allows sufficient permutations of conditions which can spawn life. But that aside. Even if you say that it is simply irrational to think that it happens on its own, I still do not understand the leap that god did it. Not just any god, your god.
Even if we are 100% wrong in our theories about how life began, which is doubtful, how is the worlds oldest hypothesis a better explanation? Did we not believe a god hurled lightning bolts down at us until we discovered static discharges in the atmosphere? Did we not once speculate that raindrops were once distraught goddesses weeping over lost lovers before we understood the process? One deity or another was always directly responsible for whatever phenomenon we could not explain until someone did. If we were wrong about those assumptions based on our ignorance, isnt it safe to assume that we are wrong in our original assumption that some supreme being is directly responsible for life
"In our youth, we lacked the maturity, the decency to create gods better than ourselves so that we might have something to aspire to. Instead we are left with a host of deities who were violent, narcissistic, vengeful bullies who reflected our own values. Our gods could have been anything we could imagine, and all we were capable of manifesting were gods who shared the worst of our natures."-Me

"Atheism leaves a man to sense, to philosophy, to natural piety, to laws, to reputation; all of which may be guides to an outward moral virtue, even if religion vanished; but religious superstition dismounts all these and erects an absolute monarchy in the minds of men." – Francis Bacon
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
@Gawdzilla-
I know of few heuristic processes that don't include cognitive bias. I'm not implying that it has to be so skewed as to deny evidence or break "realism", but do I really need to cite you examples/references for cognitive bias in both theist and atheists?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
(May 11, 2011 at 11:27 am)tackattack Wrote: @Gawdzilla-
I know of few heuristic processes that don't include cognitive bias. I'm not implying that it has to be so skewed as to deny evidence or break "realism", but do I really need to cite you examples/references for cognitive bias in both theist and atheists?

Why?
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
@Gawdzilla- Why? Because you asked me to show you? Or are you asking where is there congitive bias?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
(May 11, 2011 at 11:38 am)tackattack Wrote: @Gawdzilla- Why? Because you asked me to show you? Or are you asking where is there congitive bias?

Either/or.
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
Here's a list
This is just wiki list, but this forum as tons of others are are rife with all kinds of bias, it's almost inescapable. With your vague and uninformative line of questioning I see you are atempting to not fall into any bias. You're also not actually particimpating in the discussion, or providing information. Just because you can now in this brief window not exhibit bias, doens't mean you could sustain that and continue to effectively participate in discussion throughout your life, shall I pull some bias out of some of your posts, or are we done with this waste of my time.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
(May 11, 2011 at 11:51 am)tackattack Wrote: Here's a list
This is just wiki list, but this forum as tons of others are are rife with all kinds of bias, it's almost inescapable. With your vague and uninformative line of questioning I see you are atempting to not fall into any bias. You're also not actually particimpating in the discussion, or providing information. Just because you can now in this brief window not exhibit bias, doens't mean you could sustain that and continue to effectively participate in discussion throughout your life, shall I pull some bias out of some of your posts, or are we done with this waste of my time.

You didn't have to answer in the first place.
Reply
RE: Fundies Will Be Shitting Bricks
As an apologetic I'm inclined (read biased) to try and sufficiently answer any question posed. As a realist and agnostic though I'm happy to admit I don't know a lot of things as well.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Creatards Shall Shitteth Bricks Minimalist 6 1386 August 31, 2016 at 4:37 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  Something Else For Fundies to Piss and Moan About Minimalist 7 3469 May 12, 2012 at 4:53 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Nice Site...Something Else For Fundies to Shit Themselves About Minimalist 6 3078 October 20, 2011 at 1:56 am
Last Post: Lehrling



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)