RE: MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE
July 21, 2015 at 7:49 am
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2015 at 7:57 am by Ace.)
(July 21, 2015 at 3:55 am)robvalue Wrote: I thought the majority of the U.S. now supports gay marriage?
So a referendum would support the decision. Support it more strongly than the high court probably.

A continues statement by the majority is that more than half of the people in the United States support same sex marriages. If this is true, why are the gay communities not going through the democratic process? Inserted they are seeing the power of the court or the support of government committees/organizations.
If people do support you, then there is [b] NO REASON[/b] to continue to keep the issue out of the hands of the people in decide how both the state and nation should be.
If majority of people support same sex marriage then why is the organization now asking to be classified under federal and state law as a protected classes? What is the need for protection in the work force and in housing? True some have in the gay community have been discriminated but it is no more then other's who have also been. There is not massive crowed of people standing in the street because they have no job or home. In fact the homelessness in the U.S. has gone down since 2005. However, if such a mass discrimination were to happen would not there be a massive out-cry by all those large amount of supporters? Yet, is seems to be implied that they people allow such an event to happen.
But what of their support?
Are not the people's support not to be trusted that they will not pass equal and just laws that help the gay community?If anything in keeping the issue away from the peoples vote it looks like the gay community actually has NO TRUST trust of its supporters?
From who do you fear if your numbers are so great?
I find that the argument made that homosexuality can be fire from their jobs and can be thrown from their homes as more of a scare tactic then showing if that is occurring so dominion the gay communist. Instead, because the numbers actually are less then assumed, that the possibility that [i]“they could be[/i]” discriminated against is not different then the damn religious say that they [i]“could be forced[/i]” to marry same sex couples. And just like the homosexual community, they too are asking for protection. (i.e. religious laws) Like homosexuals, the actual number of this even occurring has been extremely over estimated