RE: MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE
July 21, 2015 at 3:10 pm
(This post was last modified: July 21, 2015 at 3:15 pm by Ace.)
(July 21, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Cato Wrote: The legislation wasn't granting rights, it was to prevent others from continuing to trample them.
Who's right were being trampled . . .??? . . Same Sex marriage??? Umm first no one was being denied the right to marry. Now what you want to "play with" is not a matter of law.
Second what civil right was being trampled on if no civil law had ever allowed same sex marriage in the first place or was even reconsidered under the federal constitution. It never was even seen as a constitutional right in both federal or state constitution!!
Also this may make you mad or crazy, which ever comes first, but the court did NOT RULE ON MARRIAGE. It rule that there were certain privet acts that a person does to be given or seen as dignified. Because marriage is one of those assumed acts for dignity, then non should be prevented form acting in a manner that will give dignity and security to individuals. Because marriage was argued to be one of the many dignity bestowing acts, it could not be restricted.
The act to perform a dignity action is what was ruled.
