(July 21, 2015 at 6:10 pm)Cato Wrote:(July 21, 2015 at 5:57 pm)Anima Wrote: However, I will ask as I have in the other thread, what is your argument in their favor that is not a fallacy? Biological, sociological, teleological, theological or otherwise. I would like to hear it if you have one.
Homosexuality is a natural trait. This is well established and is found across the natural world. You of course cannot accept this since it alone invalidates your discrimination and renders your claims of fallacy nonsensical. If you cannot acknowledge that homosexuality is a natural trait and is most certainly not simply a volitional choice, there's no helping you. It's not up for debate, you're simply wrong.
Murder/necrophilia/cannibalism/rape/retardation/blindness/deafness is a natural trait. This is well established and is found across the natural world. Perhaps we may recognize that which occurs naturally is not biologically, sociologically, or teleologically good or beneficial.
As I said even if I recognize it as natural the discussion become is it a adaptation, inconsequential, or a defect. All occur naturally. In the end it would be classified as a defect and though occurring naturally not something which is to be encouraged, promoted, or desired.
