(July 21, 2015 at 6:26 pm)Cato Wrote:(July 21, 2015 at 6:22 pm)Anima Wrote: Biologically speaking there is no such thing as a right. I think you are endeavoring to argue a thing should be allowed to be what it is biologically.
Wrong use of biology. I thought my meaning would be clear given my previous reference to the study of other apes.
I must assume you do not mean biology in terms of the habitual tendencies of the creatures. If so this would really be in stark opposition to your argument. After all such would contend the habitual tendencies of apes and all di-hybrid species on the planet is to heterosexual action. In this regard homosexuality is but a minor defective blip not even worthy of statistical significance or discussion. Is that what you meant by biology?
