MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE

[IanHulett]

I'm going to assume you're not a big fan of homosexuality. It sucks for you that you're stuck on this forum with a biromantic, gray ace(me) who enjoys the fact that I cannot be discriminated against based on my sexuality/romantic orientat... *cough* *cough* *cough* DAMMIT!!! I promised myself I wouldn't do that anymore!!! Agh!!! I'm sorry for gloating. It's kind of a reflex that I've been trying to break since marriage equality came into effect.

Fan or no fan, of gays has no barring of the fact of gays not being a protect class.

Also how the fuck can one be a "fan" about being gay.    I was under the assumption that it was natural. Its like saying i am a fan of the sun. Which has nothing to with me being a fan or no. The sun just fucking is, because it is natural element in our solar system
But hey, I could be wrong of homosexuality being a natural occurrences. . . Like you have pointed out, I have been wrong before.

Is it not the issue of housing, employment, adoption law and other shit they gay are already fitting in court? They can not argue  as protected class.

Assume all you want. I already know your an ass for you assuming shit you don't know anything about me!

Geez. That's like saying I'm not a fan of The Amazing Atheist because he's a real person.

When did I point out you being wrong? I was simply succumbing to my unfortunate reflex of gloating. I DID say I apologize for that. It's kind of tough to resist the urge when it comes up.

Well, all these things are simply a matter of viewing gay people as... well... people, obviously, that have equal rights.

Hey. I was just going by what I was reading. Whether or not you intended it that way, you kind of come across as a homophobe because of your lack of belief in Homosexuality as a legitimate protected class.

Unless I'm confusing you with someone else here? Hang on a second... 

*3 seconds later*

Nope. Just looked. I got the right person.

Did the court over set its bounds? hell yes 

Why are you opposed to gay marriage?  It is not so much marriage itself that I oppose. It is the fact that to democracy was taken way from the people. The people of the state's (better or for worse) had voted on the issue as they have a legal right to do so.

How so, did court overset its bounds? It was a 5:4 vote in favor of same sex marriage in the court ruling. Majority wins. That's how democracy works.