MARRIAGE EQUALITY NATIONWIDE

[Athene]

  You need to read my last post again. I never stated that I have to run to the internet to shore up any particular argument. That was directed towards you. That being said, I freely admit that I am not a Constitutional law scholar nor have I ever pretended to be. I just don't accept that the ability to post various portions of the Constitution on a forum can be considered expertise. It simply isn't.
  You can argue all day as to whether all people are equal or not, but that really isn't the issue.  This case, to my understanding was about whether lesbians and gays are entitled to equal protection under the law. States rights and laws become a non-issue if  Constitutional rights are being violated.  I'm certain you'll disagree and post yet another lengthy argument, so have at. It doesn't change the fact that this matter has already been decides by justices who actually have true knowledge and insight into the Constitution. That's why they're sitting on the Supreme Court and you're posting shit online, pretending that you're a damn lawyer.

Umm...  That is in fact the issue.  Furthermore States rights may only be overridden by the Commerce or Supremacy clause.  All the ruling has done is made it so any prohibition on gays or lesbians in marriage must pass strict scrutiny rather than rational basis scrutiny (feel free to look it up on the internet).  So this matter has not already been decided today anymore than it was when the bans were democratically put in place barring gays and lesbians.

I did post much of Chief Justice John Roberts comments in the dissenting opinion (you know one of the people sitting on the Supreme court).  Must of my legal statements are just explanation of his.  But I do like your posting shit online argument and pretending.  Since it appears many are posting shit and pretending they know what they are talking about (such as yourself) when they have NO FUCKING CLUE HOW THE LAW WORKS!!!  That does not keep you from posting.  So I with my wee bit more knowledge than you of how the law works shall continue.

Isn't it ironic that those of us who you claim have no clue as to how the law works, were accurate in predicting the outcome of the Court? Looks like you're the one that has no fucking clue how the law works!