(October 20, 2010 at 12:34 am)ib.me.ub Wrote:Quote:It becomes a general rule when applied to a large body along cultural lines.
That dosen't mean it is the correct method, becuase the majority think it is. Take a look at religion!
Look at language. Defined by the major usage of such.
It is an approximate method that works well in our context, which is definitions.
(October 20, 2010 at 12:34 am)ib.me.ub Wrote: But I am a bit confused with the way you have worded this. Are you talking to Existentialist or myself?
What is meant purely to Existentialist is said so accordingly. The rest is generalized.
And I am still waiting for the supposed proof or line of logic that shows this is unethical or something.
Put up or shut up. The burden of proof on ye hawkers of the word "unethical" lies within.