(August 5, 2015 at 6:49 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: That's one of the most ignorant and yet honest things I have ever heard on AF. The methodology of science is specifically tailored to the study of the natural world.That's why science hasn't found any god yet. He doesn't exist in the "natural world." Whether something exists or not is purely scientific. If I claim that an orange is in my hand, science can test my claim. If I say a orange is in my hand, and science can not prove my claim, I can not say, "I don't want a scientist to prove my claim, I want a philosopher to prove it." I could also not say, "You can not find it because it exists in a different realm beyond human comprehension," without first proving it.
How can it by ignorant and honest? Aren't those things mutually exclusive?