The data breach at Ashley Madison has revealed some shocking(!!) differences between the sexes.
To wit, a LOT, ok, many, alright, MOST, of the active subscribers on AM were men. Turns out it was a bunch of guys paying to talk with bots and among themselves rather than the statuesque babe in the profile picture. Many of the "female" accounts were created from the same IP address or by AM itself for testing purposes.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/most-hilari...57791.html
Men are from planet horn dog. Women are MIA.
To wit, a LOT, ok, many, alright, MOST, of the active subscribers on AM were men. Turns out it was a bunch of guys paying to talk with bots and among themselves rather than the statuesque babe in the profile picture. Many of the "female" accounts were created from the same IP address or by AM itself for testing purposes.
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/s/most-hilari...57791.html
Quote:But here’s the really amazing thing: When Gizmodo went to see how many Ashley Madison users checked messages they’d received from other users, the website found a hilarious disparity that showed the ratio of men checking messages to women checking messages was 13,585 : 1. Seriously.
“Overall, the picture is grim indeed. Out of 5.5 million female accounts, roughly zero percent had ever shown any kind of activity at all, after the day they were created,” Gizmodo writes. “The men’s accounts tell a story of lively engagement with the site, with over 20 million men hopefully looking at their inboxes, and over 10 million of them initiating chats. The women’s accounts show so little activity that they might as well not be there.”
Men are from planet horn dog. Women are MIA.