(August 30, 2015 at 10:04 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(August 30, 2015 at 7:29 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: You can't be serious. How is releasing a wrongly jailed 90 years old matter better than wrongly executing a 90 year old man? It is better because you didn't kill him. Fuxxake, what a stupid question.
Boru
Are we talking about moral absolutes, or about the greater good?
Consider the cost of sustaining someone who almost for sure committed serial killings:
http://www.tcpalm.com/news/newspaper-inv...h-row-cost
A million dollars per person.
Now look at convicted criminals, especially those convicted of aggravated assault, manslaughter, etc., and consider what that money could mean. Let's say a truly staggering 20% of death-row inmates didn't commit their crime. If you execute 10 men, you save 10 million dollars, at the cost of two "innocent" men (quotes because they almost always have long histories of violent or criminal activity anywah). Could you save 2 civilian lives by putting that 10 million dollars into better monitoring of paroled convicts, or rehabilitation programs, or better resources for police?
I don't know the answer, but I suspect it's a yes.
Benny, you're applying the money spent on capital punishment appeals to inmates that are not facing capital punishment. I believe it's been stated more than once in this thread alone that the appeals process is the reason capital punishment is so expensive. Your comparing apples to oranges.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.