BEASTIALITY

[Catholic_Lady]

Referring to the opening post, I think it's a stretch to say "animals don't understand what's going on" when a human tries to have sex with them.

Humans don't have a monopoly on sex. Animals understand sex, they do have it too in case you didn't notice. In any case I'm pretty sure they're going to notice if they have a 6 inch object rammed into them, let's be real.

Why does everything have to be "a secular argument" as well? All secularism means is detaching religion from the state and removing religious privilege. Beastiality doesn't need "a secular argument", if you can't work out already why beastiality is an abuse of animal rights then you don't need to be let loose on the streets.

It doesn't necessarily have to be intercourse. There are other ways to be sexual with animals that doesn't hurt them or upset them in any way. Just saying.  

I just don't understand why it's considered abusive to have a dog lick peanut butter off your privates, or to fondle their privates, while at the same time not abusive to put them in cages/crates/stables or kill them for food. People say it's wrong because they can't give consent. But they can't give consent for any of these other things we do to them.

Obviously I think bestiality is immoral, but I wouldn't say "consent" is the reason as to why it is immoral, because it's not consistent unless you think all those other things are immoral too.