RE: Deuteronomy 22:28-29
September 21, 2015 at 4:08 am
(This post was last modified: September 21, 2015 at 4:09 am by robvalue.)
As far as I'm aware, this was considered a property crime. The daughter belongs to the father, which is why he must pay him. He doesn't pay her, so it has nothing to do with child support.
It's an absolutely disgusting idea where the rape victim has no rights and is passed from her father's property to her new husband's. Trying to pretend this has anything to do with civilised society is absurd.
No, society would far worse. People could rape virgins they liked the look of in order to secure a lifetime with them, and not even be punished for it. If he wants to live in a society like that, he is sick.
It's an absolutely disgusting idea where the rape victim has no rights and is passed from her father's property to her new husband's. Trying to pretend this has anything to do with civilised society is absurd.
No, society would far worse. People could rape virgins they liked the look of in order to secure a lifetime with them, and not even be punished for it. If he wants to live in a society like that, he is sick.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
