This is bloody hard to do on mobile, so I shall expect enough appreciation to see me through to the new year.
This is why you don't get that sort of decision.
Sorry; free speech. Besides, how would you judge what constitutes "foul"? I've been far more offended by threats of post-mortem torture in plain English than by any ten 'naughty' words.
Again, that pesky free speech.
Already against the Rules.
Wow, you really have a problem with freedom of expression, don't you?
Almost none of your suggestions would be grounds for dismissal from employment. And the only one that might is already covered by the Rules. Hey, how about that?
They've really got you rattled, haven't they?
Yay, you got something right! Go you!
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: If it were my decision, you wouldn't be a mod.
This is why you don't get that sort of decision.
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: But if you really need a list from me to tell you how to clean this place up, start with:
Foul language
Sorry; free speech. Besides, how would you judge what constitutes "foul"? I've been far more offended by threats of post-mortem torture in plain English than by any ten 'naughty' words.
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Disrespecting of ANYONE's faith or non-faith
Again, that pesky free speech.
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Blasphemous memesGuess what..? Your apparent attitude towards free speech is very revealing. Plus, what is your criterion for "blasphemous"? Here in the UK, for instance, there are no blasphemy laws on the books at all.
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Personal attacks
Already against the Rules.
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Vulgar avatars (your own, for example)
Wow, you really have a problem with freedom of expression, don't you?
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: You know...the kind of stuff that would get you fired if you said or did any of it at work.
Almost none of your suggestions would be grounds for dismissal from employment. And the only one that might is already covered by the Rules. Hey, how about that?
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: Oh, and you could start banning some people who are the worst offenders...like Minimalist and dyresand, for example.
They've really got you rattled, haven't they?
(September 22, 2015 at 10:37 am)Randy Carson Wrote: NONE of that will happen, of course.
Yay, you got something right! Go you!
