RE: How would you react to a gay person who found you TOTALLY repulsive ?
September 27, 2015 at 4:19 pm
(September 27, 2015 at 3:41 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:(September 27, 2015 at 3:30 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I was presuming, in the context of the conversation, that the gay guy in question had a reason for making such a statement in conversation, rather than being unsolicited rudeness, in which case he'd just be an asshole whom I could safely ignore.
But what could that context be? Especially if the person says what the title of this thread says, that they find you "TOTALLY repulsive?" In what context is that not going to be rude?
Are you imagining a guy asking the gay man if he finds him attractive, and then the gay man tells him, "no, I don't particularly," and then pressing the matter further, with "exactly how unattractive do you find me?" Other than something like that, how could it not be rude?
I think the context of the OP is that straight guys tend to assume all gay men find all men attractive, which is simply not the case. If a straight guy were to express such a sentiment, and I were a gay guy, I'd very likely reply with, "No, I don't think you're attractive at all, and here's why."
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
