RE: How would you react to a gay person who found you TOTALLY repulsive ?
September 28, 2015 at 11:39 pm
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2015 at 11:40 pm by TheRocketSurgeon.)
(September 28, 2015 at 11:09 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote:(September 28, 2015 at 9:52 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: (That's me at 29, a few weeks before I got locked up.)
I can't see the picture (blind remember) but most women unless the have a complex are turned off by a man with a record.
^^^That's what you said to me.^^^
You specifically cited my photo and the fact that I mentioned being incarcerated, and decided to make a comment about how attractive, based on the incarceration.
If you had ever read my profile, or listened to the dozen or so times I've talked about it on this forum, you'd know that I had been WRONGLY FUCKING INCARCERATED AND RECENTLY FREED BY THE SUPREME COURT AFTER A FUCKING DECADE IN HELL.
And I call you a bigot because lots and lots of people are wrongly incarcerated in this country. We incarcerate seven times the global average for all other first-world nations except Russia. Our justice system is a joke.
So when you tell me that you can't see my picture "but most women unless they have a complex are turned off by a man with a record", it tells me you're either a bigot, an idiot, or both.
So which is it? Or do you just prefer to call me a name again?
Go to hell? Yeah. I've BEEN to hell.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
