(October 3, 2015 at 3:28 am)downbeatplumb Wrote:Wow I didn't know that.(October 3, 2015 at 3:21 am)bambi_swag Wrote: Just a note. Not just "Reverse" but also in a normal manner.
By "Reverse", I mean that Evolution started with an originally fully furnished set of organic data, and diverged downwards into different species instead of developing from a single cell. I think this because there is a lack of strong support from the Scientific Community on Abiogensis and single cell theory and also because the evolution of a single cell to a multicellular organism is not testable in an environment using the Scientific method. Basically, everything either D-evolves or spreads out in diversity.
Example: Original being -> Horse, Zebra, Donkey, -> Russian Stallion, East African Zebra etc...
Not ape to human, but kind of like human to ape sorta stuff.
Wow you need to read up on evolution particularly on the genetics side. Too much wrong here to address in one small post. For example Cod are more closely related to Giraffes than they are to Hag fish.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/animals/by/fish
You see, I know very little, I spend my day on my uncle's farm and I'm a religious character and my God feelings can subtly get in the way of my looks in Science into a big theistic bias. I know hardly anything about science so you might as well dismiss what I have to say about Evolution as I'm not qualified to speak on the topic.
