Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 18, 2025, 2:33 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific Dating
#8
RE: Scientific Dating
For the biblical timeline to be true, though, Blondie, the error would literally have to be nominally 100%.

We are talking billions of years here. That's 4.7 thousand thousand thousand years. For them to be so wrong that it's off by 4.699994 billion, the multiple dating methods would have to, like, be colluding with each other to trick us or something.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Scientific Dating - by Blondie - October 19, 2015 at 11:52 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by Ravenshire - October 19, 2015 at 11:58 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by Blondie - October 20, 2015 at 12:00 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by vorlon13 - October 20, 2015 at 12:01 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Alex K - October 20, 2015 at 5:29 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cyberman - October 20, 2015 at 12:04 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Minimalist - October 20, 2015 at 12:11 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by ignoramus - October 20, 2015 at 12:25 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by SteelCurtain - October 20, 2015 at 12:38 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Thumpalumpacus - October 20, 2015 at 12:55 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Thumpalumpacus - October 20, 2015 at 12:53 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Minimalist - October 20, 2015 at 1:12 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cato - October 20, 2015 at 7:49 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by houseofcantor - October 20, 2015 at 8:11 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by vorlon13 - October 20, 2015 at 10:06 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Minimalist - October 20, 2015 at 11:20 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cyberman - October 20, 2015 at 1:57 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by Minimalist - October 20, 2015 at 2:45 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cato - October 20, 2015 at 6:48 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by SteelCurtain - October 20, 2015 at 6:53 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cyberman - October 20, 2015 at 6:55 pm
RE: Scientific Dating - by ignoramus - October 21, 2015 at 6:28 am
RE: Scientific Dating - by Cyberman - October 21, 2015 at 7:30 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Scientific facts that freak me out. Brian37 33 11894 November 9, 2023 at 11:53 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  [split] Radiometric Dating Creatard 92 26088 November 26, 2014 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Cyberman
  Sir Isaac Newton Time life magizines "Greatest scientific thinker of our time" franca 6 6826 October 6, 2012 at 1:48 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Research shows radiometric dating still reliable (again) orogenicman 7 4063 November 16, 2010 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: orogenicman
  Radiometric Dating littlegrimlin1 20 12523 November 28, 2009 at 2:20 am
Last Post: littlegrimlin1



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)