RE: How the MH370 Flaperon Floated
October 22, 2015 at 10:07 pm
(This post was last modified: October 22, 2015 at 10:10 pm by mralstoner.)
(October 22, 2015 at 7:05 am)Cato Wrote: This link is very inconvenient for you. Typical conspiracy nut cherry picking quotes to bolster bullshit. Not unlike Jesus freaks.
https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/201...lysis.aspx
That link only talks about the drift models, which I have no dispute with. The dispute is that the coverage of barnacles suggest the flaperon was not floating (at least not in accord with the laws of physics). So, the drift models become irrelevant because the flaperon didn't float for thousands of miles, but instead was submerged for 4 months, and seemingly incapable of traveling that distance while underwater.
It's "very inconvenient for you" to actually follow the discussion rather than just throw links, and appeal to authority, and say "aha!". So who's more like the Jesus freaks?