(October 23, 2015 at 10:48 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:(October 23, 2015 at 10:10 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Science is the only basis for the truth of reality because, correctly done, it removes as much as possible bias.Quote:Is this statement true of reality? While the demarcation of science is a difficult philosophical subject, I feel safe in saying, that the above is not science!
I feel safe in saying you are wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYPgi1oUqXA
What is the alternative to scientific method to discern truth? Arguments and philosophy should always give way to evidence and that is science.
(October 23, 2015 at 10:10 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: In science it is common to not try and prove a hypothesis but to disprove it. So what you get are scientists putting forward positions that would not be true if their hypothesis was wrong and check for that. Creationists take the exact opposite view, discarding anything that does not help their faith (I wont dignify it with hypothesis because it is too ill defined to qualify as one). They are the ultimate in the use of confirmation bias and outright lies.Quote:Some do, and some do not. the same can be said for some in regards to evolution. And again I don't believe you opinion here is science, so according to your above statement it is not true of reality.
What do you mean?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
