(October 23, 2015 at 6:38 pm)Evie Wrote: It could be interpreted so many ways though.I'm not going to say it's bad or good(no offence)
Some may say that's a good thing but I say it's because the poem is vague and meaningless, it just has a contrast of 3 different themes in two groups of three words. Other than that there's no actual talent to it IMO, hence why I call my poem a B.S poem.
If you find it interesting and like it then fair enough... but I'm no poet.
My mother is a poet though.
If you have imagination though, you can make anything in to a "deeper meaning" as long as it's simple enough. I would say it's good, if it was the description I gave, but obviously i'm not going to interpret it in to something I don't like. It's an interesting thought though, that we often assume famous poets have a "deeper meaning" to their words, and prescribe our own meanings thinking the poet wrote it for a reason and/or was vague on purpose, when really the poet could have no idea what the f*ck they were talking about.
Anyways, I liked it, for what it's worth.
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?
Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.