Creation Muesum

[Esquilax]

Starvald Demelain stated that these three things did not, and have never existed.

You responded to one of those points, in a way that was not only not contextually indicated, but in fact contextually contraindicated, and then called it a day, apparently happy with your response.

I'm assuming he referring to God in number one, Show me where God has been proven to be non existent.

Absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Beyond which, you protested a post ago that you weren't an idiot, but then instantly leap to shifting the burden of proof as though nobody will call you on that?

Number two I already addressed.

You didn't, because since number two was made in reference to your religion there were clearly actual examples being referred to, but the fact that you think you did is just sad.

As for number three, just because YOU don't understand something, doesn't make it "magic".

No, what makes it magic is the part where is supernaturally suspends the established laws of physics. But hey, keep strawmanning; dishonesty is the only thing you're good for, apparently.

It would seem that you're the spokesman for Starvald Demelain and know exactly what he was thinking and in what context when he typed his post.

You don't think that when somebody posts a thing specifically in reference to christianity, their words might have specifically christian concepts in mind? Oh my, there may be no hope for you.

The point in referencing the bible verses was to show you concepts that existed in the Bible long before science gave them a definition.

It's like Columbus getting credit for discovering America even though people were already living here.

For example Einstein is credited for developing the theory of relativity, yet when the Bible states that a Day to God is like a thousand years to man, that is clearly acknowledging that time is relative, long before science "discovered" it.

Nobody is impressed that you can stretch yourself to believe that. The bible's the big book of multiple choice to begin with, people have been spinning the bible to "confirm scientific knowledge," for centuries, it's not a new thing that you've come up with. It's also not convincing, since the language is not clearly in reference to the scientific concepts you claim it is, and without your desperate reaching, nobody would come to that conclusion on their own... which they didn't. No, we discovered relativity through actual science, we didn't get the idea from the bible. Everything you're saying is just post hoc rationalization; you're just scavenging discoveries after the fact like any good parasite would.