(October 25, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(October 25, 2015 at 5:44 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: It does appear that by the part that you put in bold, that we are regressing; back away from science that supports creation, to simply ruling it out by definition. What issue do you take with believing and attempting to show that God's word and God's work are not contradictory? Are you denying any science which may point to the account of creation?
Do you agree that for a conclusion to be scientifically viable, it first has to be possible?
My question is different than Esquilax's: Do you agree that for a conclusion to be scientifically viable, it first has to be falsifiable?
If so, how is a "god hypothesis" falsifiable?