This is just another example of a theist trying to dismiss something that they use on a daily basis(just like naturalism), because it ultimately clashes with their beliefs. That's the only reason to dismiss the idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
But why is a Christian talking about evidence anyway? They've already admitted that the evidence is lacking by making faith a core tenet of their beliefs. Shouldn't roadrunner being trying to convince us to set aside the need for evidence in the first place?
But why is a Christian talking about evidence anyway? They've already admitted that the evidence is lacking by making faith a core tenet of their beliefs. Shouldn't roadrunner being trying to convince us to set aside the need for evidence in the first place?
