Creation Muesum

[SteelCurtain]

It does appear that by the part that you put in bold, that we are regressing; back away from science that supports creation, to simply ruling it out by definition.

We haven't regressed. You moved on prematurely. The rest of us are here, sitting, waiting patiently for you to produce some science that supports creation.

What issue do you take with believing and attempting to show that God's word and God's work are not contradictory? 

I have no issue with this on its own. Go ahead, cherry pick scripture and ignore the iffy parts all you want. If you want to make up a way that frogs rain from the sky or that the Nile's waters turn to blood or that a man can live inside of a fish, by all means, go ahead. Laws of physics be damned!! I do, however, take issue when you try to call this action science. Again, when you start with the axiom that the Bible is infallible and that any discrepancy between the two (work and word) is by definition a flaw in the evidence or your interpretation rather than a flaw in the word, you are not doing science. You are intellectually masturbating.

Are you denying any science which may point to the account of creation?

Not a priori. Show me some of this science. I'll let it stand on its own merits. I have asked politely for some of this creationist science multiple times, but you are loath to produce it.